A perspective on needle artifacts in MRI: An electromagnetic model for experimentally separating susceptibility effects

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 1248-1252

  Glowinski, Arndt ^a   Adam, Gerhard ^a   Bücker, Arno ^a   Van Vaals, Joop ^b   Günther, Rolf W ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Device visualization; Imaging methods; Interventional MRI; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETISM; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

GRADIENT ECHO IMAGES;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ARTIFACT; LETTER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARTIFACTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 0034351114     PISSN: 02780062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/42.897817     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. C. J. G. Bakker, M. A. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, and M. FudererSusceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: The cylinder model revisited," MRI. vol. 11, pp. 539-548, 1993.
2. C. J. G. Bakker, M. A. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, and L. M. P. RamosSimulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging," MRI, vol. 12, pp. 767-774, 1994.
3. E. M. Bellon, E. M. Haacke, P. E. Coleman, D. C. Sacco, D. A. Steiger, and R. E. GangarosaMR artifacts: A review," AJR, vol. 147, pp. 1271-1281, 1986.
4. R. Bhagwandien, R. van Ee, R. Beersma, C. J. G. Bakker, M. A. Moerland, and J. J. W. LagendijkNumerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D," MRM, vol. 10, pp. 299-313, 1992.
5. K. Butts, M. P. Pauly, B. L. Daniel, S. Kee, and A. M. NorbashManagment of biopsy needle artifacts: Techniques for RF-refocused MRI," JMRI, vol. 9, pp. 586-595, 1999.
6. A. Ericsson, A. Hemmingsson, B. Jungand, and G. O. SperberCalculation of MRI artifacts caused by static field disturbances," Phys. Med. BioL, vol. 33, pp. 1103-1112, 1988.
7. H. Chang and J. M. FitzpatrickA technique for acurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneities," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 11, pp. 319-329, Sept. 1992.
8. M. E. Ladd, P. Erhart, J. F. Debatin, B. J. Romanowski, P. Boesiger, and G. C. McKinnonBiopsy needle susceptibility artifacts,"MAM, vol. 36, pp. 646-651, 1996.
9. J. S. Lewin, J. L. Duerk, V. R. Jain, C. A. Petersilge, C. P. Chao, and J. R. HaagaNeedle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: Effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation," AJR, vol. 166, pp. 1337-1345, 1996.
10. H. Liu, A. J. Martin, and C. L. TruwitInterventional MRI at high-field (1.5T): Needle artifacts," JMRI, vol. 8, pp. 214-219, 1998.
11. K. M. Lüdeke, P. Röschmann, and R. TischlerSusceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging," Magn. Reson. Imag., vol. 3, pp. 329-343, 1985.
12. J. R. Reichenbach, R. Venkatesan, D. A. Yablonskiy, M. R. Thompson, S. Lai, and E. M. HaackeTheory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging," J. Magn Reson Imag., vol. 7, pp. 266-279, 1997.
13. K. Sekihara, M. Kuroda, andH. KohnoImage restoration from nonuniform magnetic field influence for direct fourier NMR imaging," Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 29, pp. 15-24, 1984.
14. A. Glowinski, J. Kürsch, G. Adam, A. Bücker, T. G. Noll, and R. W. GüntherDevice visualization for interventional MRI using local magnetic fields: Basic theory and its application to catheter visualization," IEEE Trans Med Imag., vol. 17, pp. 786-793, Oct. 1998.