Dimensions of competitive and cooperative learning among gifted learners

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 328-342

  Feldhusen, John F ^a   Dai, David Yun ^b   Clinkenbeard, Pamela R ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034350425     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1989). The motivation to win: Negative aspects of success at competition. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 293-305.
2. Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1998, November). In defense of individualistic goal structures: Balancing group and solitary learning. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Louisville, KY.
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
4. Dai, D. Y., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1996). Goal orientations of gifted students. Gifted and Talented International, 11, 84-88.
5. Dai, D. Y., Feldhusen, J. F. (1998, April). Mapping an interrelated network of constructs associated with goal theories: A study of gifted students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
6. Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45-63.
7. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
8. Dweck, C. S. (in press). Students' theories about their intelligence: Implications for talent and achievement. In R. Friedman (Ed.), The psychological development of the gifted child: The emotional price of excellence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Dweck, C. S., & Henderson, V. L. (1988). Theories of intelligence: Background and measures. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.
11. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1993). Gifted students illustrate what isn't cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 60-61.
12. Kline, T. J. B. (1995). Cooperativeness and competitiveness: Dimensionality and gender specificity of the Classroom Life Instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 335-339.
13. Li, A. K. F., & Adamson, G. (1992). Gifted secondary students' preferred learning style: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 46-54.
14. Matthews, M. (1992). Gifted students talk about cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 48-50.
15. Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democrative education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Rizza, M. G. (1997). Exploring successful learning with talented female adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
17. Robinson, A. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9-27.
18. Robinson, A. (1997). Cooperative learning for talented students: Emergent issues and implications. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 243-252). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Sapon-Shevin, M., & Schniedewind, N. (1993). Why (even) gifted children need cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 62-63.
20. Slavin, R. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning, and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3-8.
21. SPSS 9.0 [Computer software]. (1998). Chicago: SPSS.
22. Subotnik, R., Kassan, L., Summers, E., & Wasser, A. (1993). Genius revisited: High-IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. Thorkildsen, T. A. (1988). Theories of education among academically able adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 323-330.
24. Thorkildsen, T. A. (1994). Some ethical implications of communal and competitive approaches to gifted education. Roeper Review, 17, 54-57.