The use of institutional incentive grants for strategic change in higher education

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 281-298

  Powers, Joshua B ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034350359     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0013     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 18-26.
2. Berdahl, R., & Holland, B. (1989). Developing state fiscal incentives to improve higher education. Paper presented at a national invitational conference of the National Center for Postsecondary Governance and Finance, College Park, MD.
3. Burke, J. C., & Serban, A. M. (Eds.). (1998). Performance funding for public higher education: Fad or trend?, no. 97. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Chaffee, E. (1989). Strategy and effectiveness in systems of higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 5, pp. 1-30). New York: Agathon.
5. Chait, R. (1979). Mission madness strikes our colleges. Chronicle of Higher Education, 18(36), 36.
6. Cohen, M., & March, J. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Copa, G. H. (1983). Introduction. In G. Copa & J. Moss (Eds.), Planning and vocational education (pp. 2-6). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Covaleski, M. A., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1988). An institutional perspective on the rise: Social transformation of a university budget category. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 562-587.
9. Davies, G. (1986). The importance of being general: Philosophy, politics, and institutional mission statements. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 85-102). New York: Agathon.
10. Delong, D., & Shirley, R. (1984). Planning: Identifying the focal points for action. Planning for Higher Education, 12(4), 1-7.
11. Gates, G. S. (1997). Isomorphism, homogeneity, and rationalism in university retrenchment. The Review of Higher Education, 20, 253-275.
12. Hardy, C., Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., & Rose, J. (1984). Strategy formation in the university setting. In J. Bess (Ed.), College and university organization: Insights from the behavioral sciences (pp. 169-210). New York: New York University.
13. Hearn, J. C. (1996). Transforming U.S. higher education: An organizational perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 21(2), 141-154.
14. Hodgkinson, H. L. (1971). Institutions in transition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Indiana University. (1996). The Indiana University Strategic Directions Charter. Bloomington: Indiana University.
16. Indiana University. (1999). The Strategic Directions of Indiana University Update. Bloomington: Indiana University.
17. Jenkins, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 777-787.
18. Jones, R. A. (1996). Research methods in the social and behavioral sciences (2d ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
19. Keller, G. (1983). Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Keller, G. (1995). Creating a vision for the future. In S. L. Johnson & S. C. Rush, (Eds.), Reinventing the university: Managing and financing institutions of higher education (pp. 381-390). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Kohn, A. (1993, September-October). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 54-63.
22. Lasher, W. F., & Greene, D. L. (1993). College and university budgeting: What do we know? What do we need to know? In J. Smart, (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 9, pp. 428-469). New York: Agathon Press.
23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Massy, W. F. (1996). Resource allocation in higher education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
25. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). The structure of educational organizations. In M. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78-109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Rogers, E. M. (1983). The diffusion of innovations. London: Macmillan.
27. Rowley, D. J., Lujan, H. D., & Dolence, M. G. (1997). Strategic change in colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Savenije, B. (1992). University budgeting: Creating incentives for change? Research in Higher Education, 33, 641-656.
29. Schmidtlein, F. A., & Milton, T. H. (1989). College and university planning: Perspectives from a nation-wide study. Planning for Higher Education, 17(3) 1-19.
30. Schmidtlein, F. A., & Taylor, A. L. (1996). Responses of American research universities to issues posed by the changing environment of higher education. Minerva, 34, 291-308.
31. Senkevitch, J. J. (1992). Information service organizations and change: Exploring the role of incentive grants as instigators of organizational change. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 29, 264-268.
32. Shulock, N., & Harrison, M. E. (1998). Integrating planning, assessment, and resource allocation. Planning for Higher Education, 26(3), 29-37.
33. Stocum, D. L., & Rooney, P. M. (1997). Responding to resource constraints: A departmentally based system of responsibility center management. Change, 29(5), 50-57.
34. Strohm, P. (1983, January-February). Faculty roles today and tomorrow. Academe, 69(1), 10-15.
35. Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 26, 1-19.
36. Whalen, E. L. (1991). Responsibility center budgeting: An approach to decentralized management for institutions of higher education. Bloomington: Indiana University.