Selecting research collections for digitization: Applying the Harvard model

Library Trends

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 783-798

  Brancolini, Kristine R ^a  

^a Indiana University Libraries   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034350080     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Columbia University. (1998). Selection criteria for digital imaging projects. Retrieved January 31, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/libraries/digital/ criteria.htm.
2. Harvard University. (1998). Selection for digitization. Retrieved January 31, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://preserve.harvard.edu/resources/digitization/selection.html.
3. Hazen, D.; Horrell, J.; & Merrill-Oldham, J. (1998). Selecting research collections for digitization. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved January 31, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/hazen/ pub74.html.
4. Lee, S. D. (1999). Assessment criteria for digitization. Oxford, England: Oxford University. Retrieved January 31, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/ scoping/assessment.html.
5. Library of Congress. (1998). The Library of Congress/Ameritech 1998/99 guidelines, National Digital Library competition. Washington, DC: LC. Retrieved January 31, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/award/guide98.html.
6. Puglia, S. (1999). The costs of digital imaging projects. RLG DigiNews, 3(5). Retrieved January 31, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.rlg.org/preserv/diginews/diginews3-5.html#feature.
7. University of California. (1997). University of California selection criteria for digitization. Retrieved January 31, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.libnet.sh.cn/diglib/ digselec.htm.