The relation of a statewide alternate assessment for students with severe disabilities to other measures of instructional effectiveness

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 69-76

  Turner, Matthew D ^a   Baldwin, Leigh ^a   Kleinert, Harold L ^a   Kearns, Jacqueline Farmer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034348816     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246690003400202     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brown, L. (1991). Who are they and what do they want? An essay on TASH. In L. Meyer, C. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of persons with severe disabilities (pp. xxv-xxvii). Baltimore: Brookes.
2. Coots, J., Bishop, K., Grenot-Scheyer, M., & Falvey, M. (1995). Practices in general education: Past and present. In M. Falvey (Ed.), Inclusive and heterogeneous schools: Assessment, curriculum, and instruction (pp. 7-22). Baltimore: Brookes.
3. Coutinho, M., & Malouf, D. (1993). Performance assessment and children with disabilities: Issues and possibilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(4), 62-67.
4. Elliott, J., Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Erickson, E. (1998). What about assessment and accountability? Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), 20-27.
5. Erickson, R., Thurlow, M., & Ysseldyke, J. (1996). Neglected numerators, drifting denominators, and fractured fractions: Determining participation rates for students with disabilities in statewide assessment programs (Synthesis Report 23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center for Educational Outcomes (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 4040 801)
6. Hendrickson, J., & Gable, R. (1997). Collaborative assessment of students with diverse needs: Equitable, accountable, and effective grading. Preventing School Failure, 41, 159-163.
7. Herman, H., & Winters, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52, 48-55.
8. Hunt, P., & Farron-Davis, F. (1992). A preliminary investigation of IEP quality and content associated with placement in general education vs. special education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 247-253.
9. Hunt, P., Goetz, L., & Anderson, J. (1986). The quality of IEP objectives associated with placement on integrated versus segregated school sites. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 125-130.
10. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Jorgensen, C. (1998). Restructuring high schools for all students: Taking inclusion to the next step. Baltimore: Brookes.
11. Kearns, J., Kleinert, H., Clayton, J., Burdge, M., & Williams, R. (1998). Inclusive eduational assessments at the elementary level: Perspectives from Kentucky. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(2), 16-23.
12. Kleinert, H., Haigh, J., Kearns, J., & Kennedy, S. (in press). Alternate assessments for students with disabilities and IDEA 97: Lessons learned and roads to be taken. Exceptional Children.
13. Kleinert, H., & Kearns, J. (1999). A validation study of the performance indicators and learner outcomes of Kentucky's alternate assessment for students with significant disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 100-110.
14. Kleinert, H., Kearns, J., & Kennedy, S. (1997). Accountability for all students: Kentucky's Alternate Portfolio system for students with moderate and severe cognitive disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 88-101.
15. Kleinert, H., Kennedy, S., & Kearns, J. (1999). The impact of alternate assessments: A statewide teacher survey. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 93-102.
16. Kleinert, H., Smith, P., & Hudson, M. (1990). Quality program indicators for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute.
17. Lipsky, D., & Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America's classrooms. Baltimore: Brookes.
18. McGrew, K., Thurlow, M., & Spiegel, A. (1993). An investigation of the exclusion of students with disabilities in national data collection programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 339-352.
19. Meyer, L., Eichinger, J., & Downing, J. (1992). The Program Quality Indicators (PQI): A checklist of most promising practices in educational programs for students with severe disabilities. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Division of Special Education and Rehabilitation.
20. Meyer, L., Eichinger, J., & Park-Lee, S. (1987). A validation of Program Quality Indicators in educational services for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 251-268.
21. National Center on Educational Outcomes. (1997, November). 1997 state special education outcomes: A report on state activities during educational reform. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
22. Olson, J., & Goldstein, A. (1997, April). The inclusion of students with disabilities and limited English proficient students in large-scale assessments: A summary of recent progress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
23. Thurlow, M., Scott, D., & Ysseldyke, J. (1995a). A compilation of states' guidelines for accommodations in assessments for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
24. Thurlow, M., Scott, D., & Ysseldyke, J. (1995b). A compilation of states' guidelines for including students with disabilities in assessment (Synthesis Report 17). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
25. Vail, K. (1997). Special pioneers. The American School Board Journal, 184(12), 16-21.
26. Vanderwood, M., McGrew, K., & Ysseldyke, J. (1998). Why we can't say much about the status of students with disabilities in education reform. Exceptional Children, 64, 359-370.
27. Warlick, K., & Olsen, K. (1999). How to conduct alternate assessments: Practices in nine states. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute.
28. Yell, M., & Shriner, J. (1997). The IDEA amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30, 1-19.
29. Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., McGrew, K., & Vanderwood, M. (1994). Making decisions about the inclusion of students with disabilities in large-scale assessments (Synthesis Report 13). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
30. Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Shriner, J. (1992). Outcomes are for special educators too. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(1), 36-50.