Thinking about thinking and feeling about feeling

Behavior Analyst

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 45-56

  Moore, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior analysis; Feeling; Methodological behaviorism; Private events; Relational frame theory; Stimulus equivalence; Thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034348484     PISSN: 07386729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03391998     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, C. M., Hawkins, R. P., Freeman, K. A., & Scotti, J. R. (2000). Private events: Do they belong in a science of human behavior? The Behavior Analyst, 23, 1-10.
2. Dougher, M. J., & Hackbert, L. (2000). Establishing operations, cognition, and emotion. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 11-24.
3. Gould, S. J. (1991). The Panda's thumb of technology. In S. J. Gould, Bully for brontosaurus (pp. 59-75). New York: Norton.
4. Hayes, S. (1994). Relational frame theory as a behavioral approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno, NV: Context Press.
5. Hayes, S., & Brownstein, A. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purpose of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175-190.
6. Hyten, C., & Chase, P. N. (1991). Self-editing. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 67-81). Reno, NV: Context Press.
7. Leigland, S. (1997). Is a new definition of verbal behavior necessary in light of derived relational responding? The Behavior Analyst, 20, 3-9.
8. Moore, J. (1980). On behaviorism and private events. Psychological Record, 30, 459-475.
9. Moore, J. (1981). On mentalism, methodological behaviorism, and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 9, 55-77.
10. Moore, J. (1992). On private events and theoretical terms. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 13, 329-346.
11. Moore, J. (1995a). Radical behaviorism and the subjective-objective distinction. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 33-49.
12. Moore, J. (1995b). Some historical and conceptual relations among logical positivism, behaviorism, and cognitive psychology. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on B. F. Skinner and contemporary behaviorism (pp. 51-74). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
13. Moore, J. (1996). On the relation between behaviorism and cognitive psychology. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17, 345-368.
14. Rescorla, R., & Solomon, R. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151-182.
15. Schlinger, H., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 41-45.
16. Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270-277, 291-294.
17. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
18. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19. Skinner, B. F. (1964). Behaviorism at fifty. In T. W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology (pp. 79-97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
21. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
22. Skinner, B. F. (1978). Reflections on behaviorism and society. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Skinner, B. F. (1989). The origins of cognitive thought. American Psychologist, 44, 13-18.
24. Skinner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? American Psychologist, 45, 1206-1210.
25. Wilson, K. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2000). Why it is crucial to understand thinking and feeling: An analysis and application to drug abuse. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 25-43.