Non- and semi-parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns

Statistica Neerlandica

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 329-350

  Baddeley, A J ^a   Moller J ^b   Waagepetersen, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Kernel estimation; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Markov point process; Second order methods; Semi parametric inference; Spatial statistics; Summary statistics; Thinning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034347971     PISSN: 00390402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00144     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BADDELEY, A. J. (1999), Spatial sampling and censoring, in: O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, W. S. Kendall and M. N. M. van Lieshout (eds.), Stochastic geometry: Likelihood and Computation, Chapman and Hall/CRC, London 37-78.
2. BADDELEY, A. J. and J. MØLLER (1989), Nearest-neighbour Markov point processes and random sets, International Statistical Review, 57, 89-121.
3. BADDELEY, A. J. and B. W. SILVERMAN (1984), A cautionary example on the use of second-order methods for analyzing point patterns, Biometrics 40, 1089-1094.
4. BADDELEY, A. J. and R. TURNER (2000), Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, in press.
5. BADDELEY, A. J. and M. N. M. VAN LIESHOUT (1995), Area-interaction processes, Annuals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 47, 601-619.
6. BADDELEY, A. J., M. N. M. VAN LIESHOUT and J. MØLLER (1995), Markov properties of cluster processes, Advances in Applied Probability (SGSA) 28, 346-355.
7. BERMAN, M. and R. T. TURNER (1992), Approximating point process likelihoods using GLIM Applied Statistics 41, 31-38.
8. BESAG, J. E. (1977), Discussion contribution to Ripley (1977), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39, 193-195.
9. BRIX, A. and J. MØLLER (1998), Space-time multi type log Gaussian Cox processes with a view to modeling weed data, Research Report R-98-2012, Department of Mathematics, Aalborg University, submitted.
10. DIGGLE, P. J. (1983), Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns, Academic Press, London.
11. DIGGLE, P. J. (1985), A kernel method for smoothing point process data, Applied Statistics 34, 138-147.
12. GELFAND, A. E. and B. P. CARLIN (1991), Maximum likelihood estimation for constrained or missing data models, Research Report 91-002, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota.
13. GEORGII, H.-O. (1988), Gibbs measures and phase transitions, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
14. GEYER, C. J. (1994), On the convergence of Monte Carlo maximum likelihood calculations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 56, 261-274.
15. GEYER, C. J. (1999), Likelihood inference for spatial point processes, in: O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, W. S. Kendall and M. N. M. van Lieshout (eds.), Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation, Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, 79-140.
16. GEYER, C. J. and J. MØLLER (1994), Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 21, 359-373.
17. GOULARD, M., P. GRABARNIK and A. SÄRKKÄ (1996), Parameter estimation for marked Gibbs point processes through the maximum pseudo-likelihood method, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 23, 365-379.
18. GRABARNIK, P. and A. SÄRKKÄ (1999), Interacting neighbour point processes, submitted.
19. MØLLER, J. (1999), Markov chain Monte Carlo and spatial point processes, in: O. E. Barndorff-Neilsen, W. S. Kendall and M. N. M. van Lieshout (eds.), Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation, Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, 141-172.
20. MØLLER, J., A.-R. SYVERSVEEN and R. WAAGEPETERSEN (1998), Log Gaussian Cox processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 25, 451-482.
21. NGUYEN, X. X. and H. ZESSIN (1979), Integral and differential characterizations of the Gibbs point process, Mathematische Nachrichten 88, 105-115.
22. NIELSEN, L. S. and E. B. V. JENSEN (2000), Inhomogeneous Markov point processes by transformation, Bernouilli, to appear.
23. NUMATA, M. (1964), Forest vegetation, particularly pine stems in the vicinity of Choshi coastal flora and vegetation in Choshi, Chiba prefecture IV, Bulletin of the Choshi Marine Laboratory (6), 27-37.
24. OGATA, Y. and M. TANEMURA (1985), Estimation of interaction potentials of marked spatial point patterns through the maximum likelihood method, Biometrics 41, 421-433.
25. OGATA, Y. and M. TANEMURA (1986), Likelihood estimation of interaction potentials and external fields of inhomogeneous spatial point patterns, in: I. S. Francis, B. F. J. Manly and F. C. Lam Proceedings of the Pacific Statistical Congress-1985, 150-154.
26. PLATT, W. J., G. W. EVANS and S. L. RATHBUN (1988), The population dynamics of a long-lived conifer (Pinus palustris), The American Naturalist 131, 491-525.
27. PRESTON, C. (1976), Random fields, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
28. RIPLEY, B. D. (1977), Modelling spatial patterns (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39, 172-212.
29. RIPLEY, B. D. and F. P. KELLY (1977), Markov point processes, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 15, 188-192.
30. SÄRKKÄ, A. and A. J. BADDELEY (2001), Parameter estimation and identifiability for the Widom-Rowlinson process, in preparation.
31. STOYAN, D. and H. STOYAN (1994), Fractals, random shapes and point fields, Wiley, Chichester.
32. STOYAN, D. and H. STOYAN (1998), Non-homogeneous Gibbs process models for forestry - a case study, Biometrical Journal 40, 521-531.
33. STOYAN, D., W. S. KENDALL and J. MECKE (1995), Stochastic geometry and its applications, Wiley, New York, 2nd edition.