Perceptions of goals and processes of intercollegiate athletics: A case study

Journal of Sport Management

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 154-178

  Trail, Galen ^a   Chelladurai, Packianathan ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034344650     PISSN: 08884773     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.14.2.154     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andre, J. & James, D. N. (Eds.). (1991). Rethinking college athletics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
2. Atwell, R.H. (1991). Sports reform: Where is the faculty? Academe, 77(1), 10-12.
3. Bailey, W.S. & Littleton, T.D. (1991). Athletics and academe. New York, NY: Macmillan.
4. Baxter, V.B., Margavio, A.V. & Lambert, C. (1996). Competition, legitimation, and the regulation of intercollegiate athletics. Sociology of Sport Journal, 13, 51-64.
5. Belcourt, M., Sherman, A.W., Bohlander, G.W., & Snell, S.A. (1996). Managing human resources: Canadian edition. Toronto: Nelson Canada.
6. Bolig, L. (1998, October 12). Basketball research report submitted to membership. The NCAA News. [On-line version]. Available:
7. Branscombe, N.R. & Wann, D.L. (1991). The positive social and self-concept consequences of sports team identification. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 15, 115-127.
8. Chelladurai, P. (1985). Sport management: Macro perspectives. London, ON: Sports Dynamics.
9. Chelladurai, P. (1999). Management of sport delivery systems. Unpublished manuscript, The Ohio State University.
10. Chelladurai, P. & Danylchuk, K.E. (1984). Operative goals of intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions of athletic administrators. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 9, 33-41.
11. Chelladurai, P., Haggerty, T.R., Campbell, L. & Wall, S. (1981). A factor analytic study of effectiveness criteria in intercollegiate athletics. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 6, 81-86.
12. Chelladurai, P., Inglis, S.E. & Danylchuk, K.E. (1984). Priorities in intercollegiate athletics: Development of a scale. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 74-79.
13. Chu, D. (1989). The character of American higher education and intercollegiate sport. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
15. th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
16. Cockley, W.T. & Roswal, G.M. (1994). A comparison study of faculty members' perceived knowledge and satisfaction regarding NCAA athletic programs. Journal of Sport Behavior, 17, 217-226.
17. th). NCAA News. [On-line]. Available: < www.ncaa.org/news/961007/>
18. Connolly. T., Conlon, E.J., & Deutsch, S.J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5, 211-217.
19. Cotten, D.J. & Wilde, T.J. (1997). Sport law for sport managers. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/ Hunt Publishing Company.
20. Division I athletics certification handbook, 1993-1994. (1994). Kansas City, MO: NCAA Press.
21. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
22. Duda, J. (1989). Relationship between task and ego orientation and the perceived purpose of sport among high school athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 318-335.
23. Eitzen, D. (1988). Ethical problems in American sport. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 12, 17-30.
24. Fink, J.S. & Pastore, D.L. (1999). Do differences make a difference? Managing diversity in Division IA intercollegiate athletics. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas.
25. Finkenberg, M.E. & Moode, F.M. (1996). College students' perceptions of the purposes of sport. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 19-22.
26. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston, MA: Pitman.
27. Frey, J.H. (1994). Deviance of organizational subunits: The case of college athletic departments. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 18, 110-112.
28. Fulks, D.L. (1996). Revenues and expenses of divisions I and II intercollegiate athletic programs: Financial trends and relationships - 1995. Overland Park, KS: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
29. Fulks, D.L. (1998). Revenues and expenses of divisions I and II intercollegiate athletic programs: Financial trends and relationships - 1997. Overland Park, KS: National Collegiate Athletic Association.
30. Funk, G.D. (1991). Major violation: The unbalanced priorities in athletics and academics. Champaign, IL: Leisure Press.
31. Gerdy, J. (1992). Faculty and collegiate athletic reform: Seizing the moment. Educational Record, 73, 44-49.
32. th). Growing gains. NCAA News. [On-line]. Available:
33. Hall, R.H. (1972). Organizations: Structure and processes. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
34. Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J.H. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
35. Harrison, J.S., & Freeman, R.E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 479-485.
36. Hasenfeld, Y. (1983). Human services organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
37. Hums, M.A. & Chelladurai, P. (1994). Distributive justice in intercollegiate athletics: The views of NCAA coaches and administrators. Journal of Sport Management, 8, 200-217.
38. Inglis, S.E., & Chelladurai, P. (1983). Student perceptions of goals of intercollegiate athletics: The case of a Canadian university. Proceedings of the FISU Conference -Universidade '83. (pp. 778-787). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
39. Jones, T.M., & Wicks, A.C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206-221.
40. Knight Commission Report (1993). Report of the Knight Foundation: Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. Charlotte, NC: Knight Foundation.
41. Kniker, C.R. (1984, October). The values of athletics in schools: A continuing debate. Phi Delta Kappan, 56, 116-120.
42. Kuga, D.J. (1996). Governance of intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions of faculty members. Journal of Sport Management, 10, 140-168.
43. Lapchick, R.E. & Slaughter, J.B. (1989). The rules of the game: Ethics in college sport. New York: Macmillan.
44. Lederman, D. (1987, February 4). Many faculty members seeking greater role athletic decision-making on campuses. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A1, A39-A40.
45. Lederman, D. (1991, November 6). AAUP launches a national drive to involve professors in sports reform. Chronicles of Higher Education, pp. A47-A48.
46. Mahony, D. F. & Pastore, D. (1998). Distributive justice: An examination of participation opportunities, revenues, and expenses at NCAA institutions - 1973-1993. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22, 127-152.
47. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
48. Padilla, A. & Baumer, D. (1994). Big-time college sports: Management and economic issues. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 18, 123-143.
49. Perrow, C. (1961). The analysis of goals in complex organizations. American Sociological Review, 26, 854-866.
50. Putler, D.S. & Wolfe, R.A. (1999). Perceptions of intercollegiate athletic programs: Priorities and tradeoffs. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 301-325.
51. Robbins, S.P. (1997). Managing today! Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
52. Sack, A.S. (1988). Are "Improper benefits" really improper? A study of college athlete's views concerning amateurism. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 12, 1-16.
53. Seidler, T.L., Gerdy, J.R. & Cardinal, B.J. (1998, Summer). Athletic director authority in Division I intercollegiate athletics: Perceptions on athletic directors and university presidents. International Sports Journal, 37-46.
54. Sperber, M. (1990). College Sports Inc: The athletic department vs. the university. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
55. Telander, R. (1989). The hundred yard lie: The corruption of college football and what we can do to stop it. New York: Simon and Schuster.
56. The Ohio State University Department of Athletics. (1999). Mission statement. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
57. Trail, G.T., Fink, J.S. & Anderson, D.F. (1999). A theoretical model of sport spectator consumption behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
58. TV's battle royal. (1996, May 13). Broadcasting and Cable, pp. 35-39.
59. Underwood, J. (1984). Brutality in football. In D.S. Eitzen (Ed.), Sport in Contemporary Society (pp. 80-90). New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
60. Warriner, C.K. (1965). The problem of organizational purpose. The Sociological Quarterly, 6, 139-146.
61. Wolfe, R.A., & Putler, D.S. (1999). Addressing homogeneity of interests within stakeholder groups: Current practice, empirical assessment, and implications. Unpublished manuscript, The University of British Columbia.