Relative density estimation with censored data

Canadian Journal of Statistics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 97-111

  Cao, Ricardo ^a   Janssen, Paul ^b   Veraverbeke, Noël ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^b HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Grade density; Kaplan Meier estimator; Kernel estimator

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034344425     PISSN: 03195724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3315884     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. R. Cao, P. Janssen & N. Veraverbeke (1998). Relative density estimation and local bandwidth selection for censored data. Technical Report. Submitted for publication.
2. J. Ćwik & J. Mielniczuk (1993). Data-dependent bandwidth choice for a grade density kernel estimate. Statistics & Probability Letters, 16, 397-405.
3. K. Doksum (1974). Empirical probability plots and statistical inference for nonlinear models in the two sample case. The Annals of Statistics, 2, 267-277.
4. K. Doksum & G. L. Sievers (1976). Plotting with confidence: Graphical comparison of two populations. Biometrika, 63, 421-434.
5. A. Földes & L. Rejto (1981). A LIL type result for the product limit estimator. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete, 56, 75-86.
6. J. L. Gastwirth (1968). The first-median test a two-sided version of the control median test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63, 692-706.
7. J. L. Gastwirth & J. L. Wang (1988). Control percentile test procedures for censored data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 18, 267-276.
8. M. S. Handcock & P. L. Janssen (1995). Statistical inference for the relative distribution and relative density. Technical Report (submitted).
9. E. B. Holmgren (1995). The P-P plot as a method for comparing treatment effects. Journal of the American Statistical Association., 90, 360-365.
10. F. Hsieh (1995). The empirical process approach for semiparametric two-sample models with heterogenous treatment effect. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology, 57, 735-748.
11. F. Hsieh & B. W. Turnbull (1996). Nonparametric and semiparametric estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Annals of Statistics, 24, 25-40.
12. N. Lange, L. Ryan, L. Billard, D. Brillinger, L. Conquest & J. Greenhouse (1994). In Case Studies in Biometry. Wiley, New York.
13. G. Li, R. C. Tiwari & M. T. Wells (1996). Quantile comparison functions in two-sample problems with applications to comparisons of diagnostic markers. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 689-698.
14. S. H. Lo, Y. P. Mack & J.-L. Wang (1989). Density and hazard rate estimation for censored data via strong representation of the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 80, 461-473.
15. S. H. Lo & K. Singh (1986). The product-limit estimator and the bootstrap: Some asymptotic representations. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 71, 455-465.
16. P. Major & L. Rejto (1988). Strong embedding of the estimator of the distribution function under random censorship. The Annals of Statistics, 16, 1113-1132.
17. H. Schäfer (1986). Local convergence of empirical measures in the random censorship situation with application to density and rate estimators. The Annals of Statistics, 14, 1240-1245.
18. P. Schmidt & A. D. Witte (1988). Predicting Recidivism Using Survival Models. Springer-Verlag, New York.
19. P. Switzer (1976). Confidence procedures for two-sample problems. Biometrika, 63, 13-26.