Regulating dangerous futures: The German embryo protection act of 1990 - Legislation in risk society

Social and Legal Studies

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 205-226

  Augst, Charlotte ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034344266     PISSN: 09646639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/096466390000900202     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bauman, Z. (1991) Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Beck, U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
3. Beck, U., A. Giddens and S. Lash (1994) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Brown, P. (1995) 'popular epidemiology, toxic waste and social movements', pp. 91-112 in Jonathan Gabe (ed.) Medicine, Health and Risk: Sociological Approaches. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Bundesärztekammer (1992a) 'Richtlinien zur Forschung an frühen menschlichen Embryonen', in Rolf Keller, Hans-Ludwig Günther and Peter Kaiser (eds) Kommentar zum Embryonenschutzgesetz. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
6. Bundesärztekammer (1992b) 'Richtlinien zur Durchführung der In-Vitro-Fertilisation mit Embryotransfer und des intratubaren Embryotransfers als Behandlungsmethoden der menschlichen Unfruchtbarkeit' in Rolf Keller, Hans-Ludwig Günther and Peter Kaiser (eds) Kommentar zum Embryonenschutzgesetz. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
7. Callahan, S. (1997) 'Gays, Lesbians and the Use of Alternate Reproductive Technologies', pp. 188-202 in Hilde Lindemann-Nelson (ed.) Feminism and Families. New York and London: Routledge.
8. Carter, S. (1995) 'Boundaries of danger and uncertainty: an analysis of the technological culture of risk assessment', pp. 133-50 in Jonathan Gabe (ed.) Medicine, Health and Risk: Sociological Approaches. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Corea, G. (1985) The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. London: The Women's Press, reprinted 1988.
10. Corea, G. and Susan Ince (1987) 'Report of a Survey of IVF Clinics in the US', pp. 133-46 in Patrizia Spallone and Deborah Lynn Steinberg (eds) Made To Order: The Myth of Reproductive and Genetic Progress. Oxford: Pergamon.
11. Dingwall, R. (1994) 'Litigation and the threat to medicine', pp. 46-64 in Jonathan Gabe, David Kelleher and Gareth Williams (eds) Challenging Medicine. London and New York: Routledge.
12. Douglas, G. and N. V. Lowe (1992) 'Becoming a Parent in English Law', The Law Quarterly Review 108: 414.
13. Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge, reprinted 1995.
14. Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
15. Doyal, L. (1994) 'Managing Conception: Self-Insemination and the Limits of Reproductive Freedom', Policy and Politics 22: 89.
16. Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality, Volume I: An Introduction. London: Penguin Books.
17. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Giddens, A. (1998) 'Risk Society: The Context of British Politics', in Jane Franklin (ed.) The Politics of Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press in Association with the IPPR.
19. Hanmer, J. (1997) 'Women and Reproduction', pp. 349-74 in Diane Richardson and Victoria Robinson (eds) Introducing Women 's Studies, 2nd edn. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
20. Hirsch, E. (1995) 'New Reproductive Technologies and the "Modern Condition" in Southern England', in Rosalind Gill and Keith Grint (eds) The Gender Technology Relation: Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Taylor & Francis.
21. Kelleher, D., Jonathan Gabe and Gareth Williams (1994) 'Understanding medical dominance in the modern world', pp. xi-xxix in Jonathan Gabe, David Kelleher and Gareth Williams (eds) Challenging Medicine. London and New York: Routledge.
22. Klein, R. (ed.) (1989) Infertility: Women Speak about their Experiences of Reproductive Medicine. London: Pandora.
23. Kratz, C. (1997) 'Parenthood at Risk', pp. 77-93 in Robert Baldwin with assistance of Peter Cane (ed.) Law and Uncertainty: Risks and Legal Processes. London: Kluwer Law International.
24. Luhmann, N. (1993) Risk - A Sociological Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
25. MacKenzie, D. and Judith Wajcman (eds) (1985) The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
26. Millns, S. (1995) 'Making "social judgements that go beyond the purely medical": The Reproductive Revolution and Access to Fertility Treatment Services', pp. 27-42 in J. Bridgeman and S. Millns (eds) Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body. Aldershot/Hants: Dartmouth.
27. Mulkay, Michael (1997) The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Nicholson, L. (1997) 'The Myth of the Traditional Family', pp. 27-42 in H. Lindemann-Nelson (ed.) Feminism and Families. London: Routledge.
29. Raymond, J. G. (1993) Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technologies and the Battle over Women's Freedom. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
30. Sheldon, S. (1993) 'Who is the Mother to Make the Judgement? Construction of Women in English Abortion Law', Feminist Legal Studies 1: 3-22.
31. Sheldon, S. (1995) 'The Law of Abortion and the Politics of Medicalisation', in J. Bridgeman and S. Millns (eds) Law and Body Politics: Regulating the Female Body. Aldershot/Hants: Dartmouth.
32. Sheldon, S. (1997) Beyond Control: Medical Power, Women and Abortion Law. London: Pluto.
33. Slaughter, M. M. (1995) 'The Legal Construction of "Mother"', pp. 73-100 in Martha Albertson Fineman and Isabel Karpin (eds) Mothers in Law: Feminist Theory and the Legal Regulation of Motherhood. New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Smart, C. (1987) '"There is of Course the Distinction Dictated by Nature": Law and the Problem of Paternity', pp. 98-117 in Michele Stanworth (ed.) Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. Spallone, P. and D. L. Steinberg (1987) Made to Order: The Myth of Reproductive and Genetic Progress. Cambridge: Pergamon.
36. Stanworth, M. (1987) 'Reproductive Technologies and the Deconstruction of Motherhood', pp. 10-35 in M. Stanworth (ed.) Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicines. Oxford: Polity Press.
37. Steinberg, D. L. (1997) Bodies in Glass: Genetics, Eugenics and Embryo Ethics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
38. Strathern, M. (1999) 'Regulation, Substitution and Possibility', pp. 171-202 in Jeanette Edwards, S. Franklin, E. Hirsch, F. Price and M. Strathern Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception, 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.
39. Thomas, P.A. (1993) 'The Nuclear Family, Ideology and AIDS in the Thatcher Years', Feminist Legal Studies 1: 23-4.
40. Thomson, M. (1997) 'Legislating for the Monstrous: Access to Reproductive Services and the Monstrous Feminine', Social & Legal Studies 6: 401-24.
41. Wajcman, J. (1991) Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press with Blackwell.
42. Wynne, B. (1996) 'May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide', pp. 44-83 in Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszinski and Brian Wynne (eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London: Sage.