Ontological interpretation with contextualism of accidentals

Journal of the Korean Physical Society

Volumn 37, Issue 5 Part 1, 2000, Pages 490-495

  Kim, Myeongseok ^a   Jo, Sang Gyu ^a   Choi, Sang Don ^a   Kim, Ho Il ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034343739     PISSN: 03744884     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3938/jkps.37.490     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. A. Petersen, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 19, 12 (1963).
2. R. Omnés, The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994), p. xiii, 507.
3. D. Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1980), pp. 163-180.
4. D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford University Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984).
5. D. Davidson, Dialectica 45, 191 (1991).
6. D. Davidson, in Current Issues in Idealism, edited by P. Coates and D. Hutto (Thoemmes, Bristol, 1996), pp. 155-176.
7. F. Selleri, Quantum Paradoxes and Physical Reality (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990), pp. 1-30.
8. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
9. A. Einstein, J. Franklin Institute 225, 349 (1936).
10. A. Einstein, "Autobiographical Notes" and "Reply to Criticism," in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by P. Schilpp (Open Court, La Sale, Ill., 1949), pp. 3-94 and 663-88.
11. A. Fine, Found. Phys. 20, 943 (1990).
12. P. Holland, The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993). He says that "we cannot empirically prove the hypothesis that a quantum system comprises a corpuscular aspect possessing simultaneously well-defined position and momentum variables by experiments compatible with the axioms of quantum measurement. But conversely, [⋯] it cannot be proved by experiments that are designed to test and that confirm the quantum rules that the concept of a corpuscle is inadmissible" (p. 354).
13. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952).
14. D. Bohm and B. Hiley, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Routledge, London, 1993). They say that "[o]ntology is concerned primarily with that which is and only secondarily with how we obtain our knowledge about this (in the sense, for example, that the process of observation would be treated as interaction between the observed system and the observing apparatus regarded as existing together in an way that does not depend significantly on whether these are known or not)" (p. 2).
15. J. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), p. 52.
16. L. Ballentine, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 358 (1970).
17. A. Fine, The Shaky Game: Einstein Realism and the Quantum Theory, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996).
18. J. Vigier, Astron. Nachr. 303, 55 (1982).
19. D. Home and M. Whitaker, Phys. Rep. 210, 223 (1992).
20. R. Penrose, The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).
21. S. Hawking and R. Penrose, The Nature of Space and Time (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1996), pp. 134-135.
22. J. Cushing, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1994).
23. A. Valentini, On the Pilot-Wave Theory of Classical, Quantum and Subquantum Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).
24. J. Cushing, A. Fine, and S. Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996).
25. L. Ballentine, Am. J. Phys. 42, 1763 (1972).
26. L. Ballentine, Am. J. Phys. 54, 883 (1986).
27. L. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1990).
28. I. Fenyẽs, Z. Phys. 132, 81 (1952).
29. E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. 150, 1079 (1966).
30. E. Nelson, Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1967).
31. L. de la Peña and A. Cetto, Found. Phys. 5, 355 (1975).
32. E. Nelson, Quantum Fluctuations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1985).
33. D. Home and M. Whitaker, Phys. Lett. A115, 81 (1986).
34. D. Mermin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803 (1993).
35. S. G. Jo, S. D. Choi, H. I. Kim and M. Kim (unpublished).
36. P. Zweifel, Int. J. Theo. Phys. 10, 67 (1974).
37. C. Roychoudhuri, Found. Phys. 8, 845 (1978).
38. H. Tschudi, Helv. Phys. Acta. 60, 363 (1987).
39. M. Kim, S. G. Jo, S. D. Choi, J. H. Kim, C. Y. Li and J. S. Moun, Sae Mulli (New Phys.) 38, 251 (1998).
40. A. Gleason, J. Math. Mech. 6, 885 (1957).
41. J. Bell, Physica 1, 195 (1964).
42. J. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447 (1966).
43. S. Kochen and E. Specker, J. Math. Mech. 7, 59 (1967).
44. T.-G. Noh and C. J. Hong, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 33, 383 (1998).
45. K.-H. Yeon, D.-H. Kim, S. Zhang and C.-I. Um, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 33, 638 (1998).
46. C.-I. Um and S.-K. Hong, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 36, 72 (2000).
47. M. Kim, S. G. Jo, J. H. Kim, H. M. Jeon, J. Y. Sug and S. D. Choi, Sae Mulli (New Phys.) 39, 149 (1999).
48. M. Kim, S. G. Jo, S. D. Choi, J. H. Kim, H. M. Jeon and H. I. Kim, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 3117 (1999).
49. C. Pagonis and R. Clifton, Found. Phys. 25, 281 (1995).
50. M. J. Maczynski, Rep. Math. Phys. 2, 135 (1971).
51. M. Redhead, Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989), p. 18 and 120.
52. A. Cabello, Phys. Rev. A59, 113 (1999).
53. A. Peres, Phys. Lett. A151, 107 (1990).
54. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990).