Idiographic complexity and the common personality dimensions insensitivity, extraversion, neuroticism, and orderliness

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 217-243

  Van Kampen, D ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034343116     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0984(200005/06)14:3<217::AID-PER374>3.0.CO;2-G     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen JG, Coyne L. 1995. Dissociation and vulnerability to psychotic experience. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 183: 615-622.
2. Allport GW. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Holt: New York.
3. Allport GW. 1955. Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality. Yale University Press: New Haven.
4. Allport GW. 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality. Rinehart and Winston: New York.
5. Allport GW. 1962. The general and the unique in psychological science. Journal of Personality 30: 405-422.
6. Allport GW. 1965. Letters from Jenny. Harcourt, Brace and World: New York.
7. Bakan D. 1969. On Method: Toward a Reconstruction of Psychological Investigation. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
8. Baldwin AL. 1942. Personal structure analysis: a statistical method for investigation of the single personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 37: 163-183.
9. Bem DJ, Allen A. 1974. On predicting some of the people some of the time: the search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review 81: 506-520.
10. Block J. 1995. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin 117: 187-215.
11. Bonarius JC. 1969. De eksperimentele benadering van de individuele kliënt ['The experimental approach to the individual client']. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 24: 569-579.
12. Cattell RB (Ed.). 1966. Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology. Rand McNally: Chicago.
13. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. 1985. The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL.
14. Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. 1992. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 13: 653-665.
15. Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE. 1993. Statistical prediction versus clinical prediction: improving what works. In A Handbook for Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences: Methodological Issues, Keren G, Lewis C (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 351-367.
16. De Groot AD. 1966. Methodologie: Grondslagen van Onderzoek en Denken in de Gedrags-wetenschappen. [Methodology: Foundations of Research and Theory in the Behavioural Sciences]. Mouton: Den Haag.
17. Eysenck HJ. 1947. Dimensions of Personality. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.
18. Eysenck HJ. 1967. The Biological Basis of Personality. Thomas: Springfield.
19. Eysenck HJ. 1992. Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences 13: 667-673.
20. Eysenck HJ. 1994a. The Big Five or Giant Three: criteria for a paradigm. In The Developing Structure of Temperament and Personality from Infancy to Adulthood, Halverson CF, Kohnstamm GA, Martin RP (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 37-51.
21. Eysenck HJ. 1994b. The importance of theory in the taxonomy of personality. In Personality Psychology in Europe, Vol. 5, De Raad B, Hofstee WKB, Van Heck GL (eds). Tilburg University Press: Tilburg; 6-13.
22. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. 1969. Personality Structure and Measurement. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.
23. Gibbons H, Rammsayer TH. 1999. Differential effects of personality traits related to the P-ImpUSS dimension on latent inhibition in healthy female subjects. Personality and Individual Differences 27: 1157-1166.
24. Goldberg LR. 1992. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 4: 26-42.
25. Goldberg LR. 1993. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48: 26-34.
26. Goldberg LR, Rosolack TK. 1994. The Big Five factor structure as an integrative framework: an empirical comparison with Eysenck's P-E-N model. In The Developing Structure of Temperament and Personality from Infancy to Adulthood, Halverson CF, Kohnstamm GA, Martin RP (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 7-35.
27. Hendriks AAJ. 1997. The construction of the Five-Factor Personality Inventory (FFPI). Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Netherlands.
28. Holt RR. 1962. Individuality and generalization in the psychology of personality. Journal of Personality 30: 377-404.
29. John OP, Robins RW. 1993. Gordon Allport: father and critic of the Five-Factor model. In Fifty Years of Personality Psychology, Craik KH, Hogan R, Wolfe RN (eds). Plenum: New York: 215-236.
30. Johnson JA. 1994. Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C model. European Journal of Personality 8: 311-334.
31. Kelly GA. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton: New York.
32. Kleinmuntz B. 1990. Why we still use our heads instead of the formulas: toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin 107: 296-310.
33. Kluckhohn CM, Murray HA. 1953. Personality formation: the determinants. In Personality in Nature, Society, and Culture, Kluckhohn CM, Murray HA, Schneider DM (eds). Knopf: New York; 53-67.
34. Lamiell JT. 1981. Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist 36: 276-289.
35. Lamiell JT. 1990. Explanation in the psychology of personality. In Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol. 6, Robinson DN, Mos LP (eds). Plenum: New York; 153-192.
36. Levy LH. 1970. Conceptions of Personality: Theories and Research. Random: New York.
37. Loevinger J. 1994. Has psychology lost its conscience? Journal of Personality Assessment 62: 2-8.
38. Lynn SJ, Rhue JW. 1988. Fantasy proneness: hypnosis, developmental antecedents and psychopathology. American Psychologist 43: 35-44.
39. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. 1985a. Updating Norman's "adequate taxonomy": intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 710-721.
40. McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. 1985b. Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism scales with measures of the Five-Factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 6: 587-597.
41. Moosbrugger H, Fischbach A. 1999. 'Evaluation of the dimensionality of the Eysenck Personality Profiler - German version: a contribution to the "Super Three" vs. "Big Five" discussion'. Arbeiten aus dem Institut für Psychologie, No. 7, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main.
42. Ortet G, Ibáñez MI, Moro M, Silva F, Boyle GJ. 1999. Psychometric appraisal of Eysenck's revised Psychoticism scale: a cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences 27: 1209-1219.
43. Pelham BW. 1993. The idiographic nature of human personality: examples of the idiographic self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 665-677.
44. Pervin LA. 1976. A free-response description approach to the analysis of person-situation interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 465-474.
45. Rawlings D, Freeman JL. 1997. Measuring paranoia/suspiciousness. In Schizotypy: Implications for Illness and Health, Claridge G (ed.). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 38-60.
46. Rosenzweig S. 1951. Idiodynamics in personality theory with special reference to projective methods. Psychological Review 58: 213-223.
47. Runyan WM. 1983. Idiographic goals and methods in the study of lives. Journal of Personality 51: 413-437.
48. Saucier G. 1992. Openness versus Intellect: much ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality 6: 381-386.
49. Saucier G, Goldberg LR. 1996. The language of personality: lexical perspectives on the Five-Factor model. In The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives, Wiggins JS (ed.). Guilford: New York; 21-50.
50. Saucier G, Goldberg LR. 1998. What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality 66: 495-524.
51. Schiller R, Tellegen A, Evens J. 1995. An idiographic and nomothetic study of personality description. In Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 10, Butcher JN, Spielberger CD (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 1-23.
52. Sectie voor Psychologisch Onderzoek van het Belgisch Leger, Brussel, en Laboratorium voor Persoonlijkheidsonderzoek, Leuven (SPOLAP). 1987a. Handleiding Vrije Zelfbeschrijvingsmethode VZM. [Manual of the Free Self-Description Method VZM]. Swets and Zeitlinger: Lisse, Netherlands.
53. Sectie voor Psychologisch Onderzoek van het Belgisch Leger, Brussel, en Laboratorium voor Persoonlijkheidsonderzoek, Leuven (SPOLAP). 1987b. Quotatielijst voor Uitdrukkingen Vrije Zelfbeschrijvingsmethode VZM. [Quotation List for Expressions Free Self-Description Method VZM]. Swets and Zeitlinger: Lisse, Netherlands.
54. Tellegen A, Waller NG. 1987. Re-examining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Paper presented at the 95th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, August.
55. Tucker LR. 1951. A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section Report No. 984, Department of the Army, Washington, DC.
56. Turner RG, Gilliland L. 1979. The comparative relevance and predictive validity of subject generated trait descriptions. Journal of Personality 47: 230-244.
57. Van Kampen D. 1981. Theorie van klinische assessment [Theory of clinical asssessment]. In Inleiding in de Klinische Psychologie [Introduction to Clinical Psychology], Cassee AP, Höweler M, Janssen RHC (eds). Van Loghum Slaterus: Deventer, Netherlands; 69-111.
58. Van Kampen D. 1993. The 3DPT dimensions S, E, and N: a critical evaluation of Eysenck's Psychoticism model. European Journal of Personality 7: 65-105.
59. Van Kampen D. 1996. The theory behind Psychoticism: a reply to Eysenck. European Journal of Personality 10: 57-60.
60. Van Kampen D. 1997. Orderliness as a major dimension of personality: from 3DPT to 4DPT. European Journal of Personality 11: 211-242.