Receptor-product coupling scheme for synchronization

Progress of Theoretical Physics

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 229-244

  Nagano, Seido ^a  

^a NEC CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034341062     PISSN: 0033068X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/PTP.103.229     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. C. Huygens, Hologium Oscillatorium (F. Muguet, Paris, 1673), p. 117.
2. C. M. Gray, P. König, A. K. Engel and W. Singer, Nature 338 (1989), 334.
3. W. Singer, A. K. Engel, A. K. Kreiter, M. H. J. Munk, S. Neuenschwander and P. R. Roelfsema, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1997), 252.
4. J. Buck and E. Buck, Nature 211 (1966), 562.
5. B. Ermentrout, J. Math. Biol. 29 (1991), 571.
6. B. Alberts, D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts and J. D. Watson, Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd ed. (Garland Publishing, New York, 1994), p. 874.
7. J. S. Takahashi, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (1995), 531.
8. J. Dunlap, Science 280 (1998), 1548.
9. S. H. Strogatz, J. Math. Biol. 25 (1987), 327.
10. B. van der Pol, Phil. Mag. 2 (1926), 978.
11. A. T. Winfree, The Geometry of Biological Time (Springer, Berlin, 1980).
12. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
13. M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 (1993), 851.
14. V. Hakim and W. J. Rappel, Phys. Rev. A46 (1992), R7347.
15. N. Nakagawa and K. Kuramoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 89 (1993), 313; Physica D80 (1995), 307.
16. N. Nakagawa and K. Kuramoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 89 (1993), 313; Physica D80 (1995), 307.
17. H. Tanaka and S. Oishi, Butsuri 53 (1998), 200.
18. S. Nagano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998), 4826.
19. W. F. Loomis, Dictyostelium discoideum (Academic Press, New York, 1975).
20. R. A. Firtel, Genes & Development 9 (1995) 1427; Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 6 (1996), 545.
21. R. A. Firtel, Genes & Development 9 (1995) 1427; Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 6 (1996), 545.
22. In this paper, a characteristic of a limit cycle oscillator is that all motions of the system tend toward a stable steady-state oscillation. The maximum (minimum) allowed production level is the maximum (minimum) value of this steady-state oscillation.
23. j in function G, a stable steady-state oscillation cannot be obtained.
24. J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology (Springer, Berlin, 1993), p. 262.
25. A. Sherman and J. Rinzel, Roc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992), 2471.
26. H. Fujii and Y. Sawada, J. Chem. Phys. 69 (1978), 3830.
27. M. Yoshimoto, K. Yoshikawa, Y. Mori and I. Hanazaki, Chem. Phys. Lett. 189 (1992), 18.
28. Note that the amplitudes of the stable steady-state oscillations of de-coupled van der Pol oscillators are nearly 2.0, and the natural frequency dependence is very weak.
29. In the case of decoupled van der Pol oscillators, the maximum allowed production level is nearly 2.0 and the minimum allowed production level is nearly -2.0.
30. j.
31. The current scheme has also been applied to predator-prey models with a limit cycle given by Eq. (3.18) (p. 72) and Eq. (6.20) (p. 156), and to the Brusselator reaction (p. 175), in Mathematical Biology by J. D. Murray (Ref. 22)).