"Community" is what i think everyone is talking about

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 305-317

  Hunt, Pam ^a   Hirose Hatae, Anne ^a   Doering, Kathy ^b   Karasoff, Patricia ^a   Goetz, Lori ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Berkeley Unified School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034340149     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193250002100507     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J. J., & Friend, M. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 17-22.
2. Cox, K., O'Brian, M., Morrison, D., Swastek, R., & Aloia, G. (1999, December). Flexible service delivery: Meeting the needs of diverse learners. Paper presented at the conference of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, Chicago.
3. Daniel R. R. v. State of Texas Board of Education, 847 F. 2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).
4. Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (1965).
5. Falvey, M. A. (1995). Inclusion and heterogeneous schooling: Assessment, curriculum, and instruction. Baltimore: Brookes.
6. Friend, M., Reistag, M., & Cook, L. (1993), Co-teaching: An overview of the past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future. Preventing School Failure, 37(4), 6-10.
7. Greer v. Rome [Geogia] City School District, 950 F. 2d 688, 697 (11th Cir. 1991).
8. Healthy Start Support Services for Children Act (1992). California Education Code (1976), § 8800 et seq.
9. Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (1997). Research on inclusive educational programs, practices and outcomes for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 3-29.
10. Illinois State Board of Education. (1999). Flexible service delivery: A framework of operation. Springfield, IL: Author.
11. Improving America's Schools Act, Pub. L. No. 103-336, 198 Stat. 3518 (1994).
12. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
13. Jorgensen, C. (1998). Restructuring high schools for all students. Baltimore: Brookes.
14. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Krueger, R. A. (1998a). Analyzing & reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Krueger, R. A. (1998b). Developing questions for focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Kunc, N. (1992). The need to belong: Rediscovering Maslow's hierarchy of needs. In R. A. Villa, J. S. Thousand, W. Stainback, & S. Stainback (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education (pp. 25-39). Baltimore: Brookes.
18. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Lipsky, D., & Gartner, A. (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Baltimore: Brookes.
20. Lipsky, D., & Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion of school reform: Transforming America's classrooms. Baltimore: Brookes.
21. Mattson, B., & Beckstrom, S. (1999). Coordinating Title 1 Schoolwide Programs with 1997 Amendments to The Individuals with Disabilities Act. Arlington, VA: RMC Research.
22. McLaughlin, M. J. (1995). Consolidated special education funds and services: A local perspective (Policy paper #5). Palo Alto, CA: Center for Special Education Finance.
23. McLaughlin, M. J., & Warren, S. H. (1994). Resource implications of inclusion: Impressions of special education administrators at selected sites (Policy paper #1). Palo Alto, CA: Center for Special Education Finance.
24. Miles, K. H. (1995). Freeing resources for improving schools: A case study of teacher allocation in Boston Public Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 476-493.
25. Miles, K. H,. & Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high-performing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(1), 9-29.
26. Morgan, D. L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
27. O'Berti v. New Jersey Board of Education, 995 F. 2d 1204 (3d Cir. 1993).
28. Parrish, T. B. (1997). Fiscal issues relating to special education inclusion. In D. K. Lipsky & A. Gartner (Eds.), Inclusion and school reform (275-298). Baltimore: Brookes.
29. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative education and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Postman, N. (1996). The end of education: Redefining the value of school. New York: Random House.
31. Rainforth, B., & York-Barr, J. (1997). Collaboration teams for students with severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
32. Sacramento City Unified School District v. Rachel Holland, 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994).
33. Sailor, W. (1991). Special education in the restructured school. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 8-22.
34. Sailor, W., Gee, K., & Karasoff, P. (1993). Full inclusion and school restructuring. In M. Snell (Ed.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (pp. 1-30). New York: Macmillan.
35. Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (Eds.) (1990). Support networks for inclusive schooling: Interdependent integrated education. Baltimore: Brookes.
36. Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (Eds.) (1996). Inclusion: A guide for educators. Baltimore: Brookes.
37. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (1990). Strategies for educating learners with severe disabilities within their local home schools and communities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(3), 1-24.
39. White, W. (1994). California's state partnership for school-linked services. In L. Alder & S. Gardner (Eds.), The politics of linking schools and social services (pp. 171-178). Washington, DC: Palmer Press.