Sensory characteristics and consumer liking for cereal bar snack foods

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 327-345

  Bower, John A ^a   Whitten, Robert ^b  

^a QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b West Longridge Farm   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

THEOBROMA CACAO;

EID: 0034336680     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2000.tb00274.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ANON. 1993. Taking a bigger bite. Grocer, June 26th, 71-72.
2. BOUSTANI, P. and MITCHELL, V.W. 1990. Cereal Bars: A Perceptual, Chemical And Sensory Analysis. British Food J. 92(5), 17-22.
3. BROOM, R. 1990. On the hoof. Food Processing, October, 21-24.
4. CHAN, W., BROWN, J. and BUSS, D.H. 1994. Miscellaneous Foods, Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, Royal Society of Chemistry and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.
5. DAILLANT-SPINNIER, B., MACFIE, H.J.H., BEYTS, P.K. and HEDDERLEY, D. 1996. Relationships between perceived sensory properties and major preference directions of 12 varieties of apples from the Southern hemisphere. Food Qual. Pref. 2, 113-126.
6. DE KROON, J. and VAN DER LAAN, P. 1981. Distribution-free test procedures in two-way layouts; a concept of rank-interaction. Statistica Neerlandica 35(4) 189-213.
7. DIBB, S. 1995. Health Wagon Free-For-All? Low & Lite 1(2), November, 7.
8. GREENHOFF, K. and MACFIE, H.J.H. 1994. Preference mapping in practice. In Measurement of Food Preference, (H.J.H. MacFie and D.M.H. Thompson, eds.) pp. 137-166, Blackie Academic and Professional, London.
9. HEDDERLEY, D. and WAKELING, I. 1995. A comparison of imputation techniques for internal preference mapping, using Monte Carlo simulation. Food Qual. Pref. 6, 281-297.
10. HELGESEN, H., SOLHEIM, R. and NAES, T. 1997. Consumer preference mapping of dry fermented lamb sausages. Food Qual. Pref. 8, 97-109.
11. HILLIAM, M. 1995. The market for healthy and functional confectionery. World Ingredients, Jan.-Feb., 8-12.
12. JACK, F.R., O'NEILL, J., PIACENTINI, M.G. and SCHRODER, M.J.A. 1997. Perception of fruit as a snack: A comparison with manufactured snack foods. Food Qual. Pref. 8, 175-182.
13. Jordans UK LTD. 1996. Public information pack.
14. LYON, D.H., FRANCOMBE, M.A., HASDELL, T.A. and LAWSON, K. 1992. Guidelines For Sensory Analysis In Food Product Development And Quality Control. Chapman & Hall, London.
15. MACFIE, H. and BRATCHELL, N. 1989. Designs to balance the effect of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests, J. Sensory Studies 4, 129-148.
16. MCVICKER, R.G. 1994. Healthful eating: the food industry's role. Nutrition Today, January/February, 37-38.
17. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G. and CARR, B. 1991. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, London.
18. NICHOLLS, K. 1996. Focus On Mars Confectionery. Sept. 1-12, Mars Confectionery UK, Slough.
19. PERYAM, D.R. and PILGRIM, F.J. 1957. Hedonic scale method of measuring food preference. Food Technol. 11(9), 9-14 (supplement).
20. PIGGOT, J.R. and SHARMAN, K. 1986. Methods to aid interpretation of multidimensional data. In Statistical Procedures in Food Research. (J.R. Piggot, ed.) pp. 181-232, Elsevier Applied Science, London.
21. POWERS, J.J. and WARE, G.O. 1986. Discrimination Analysis. In Statistical Procedures in Food Research, (J.R. Piggot, ed.) pp. 125-180, Elsevier Applied Science, London.
22. RICHARDSON, D.P. 1995. UK food industry responses to the health of the nation white paper. Brit. Food J. 97(2), 3-9.
23. SOLFRONIOU, P. 1991. How Healthy Is Health Food? NFT Investigates The Hidden Sugars and Undesirable Fats. Natural Food Trader, October, 9-10.
24. STONE, H. and SIDEL, J.L. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, London.
25. SZCZESNIAK, A.S. 1975. General foods texture profile revisited - ten year perspective. J. Texture Studies 6, 5-17.
26. WAKELING, I.N. and MACFIE, H.J.H. 1995. Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Qual. Pref. 6, 299-308.