Predicting classroom achievement from active responding on a computer-based groupware system

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 53-60

  Shin, Jongho ^a   Deno, Stanley L ^a   Robinson, Steven L ^b   Marston, Douglas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b Discourse Technologies   (United States)

^c Minneapolis Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034336302     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193250002100107     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, L. M. (1981). Short-term student responses to classroom instruction. Elementary School Journal, 82, 97-108.
2. Becker, H. J. (1992). A model for improving the performance of integrated learning systems: Mixed individualized/group/whole class lessons, cooperative learning, and organizing time for teacher-led remediation of small groups. Educational Technology, 32, 6-15.
3. Bloom, B. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teacher College Record, 64, 723-733.
5. Carroll, J. B. (1985). The model of school learning: Progress of an idea. In C. W. Fisher & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspectives on instructional time (pp. 29-58). New York: Longman.
6. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
7. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45.
8. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
9. Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 219-242.
10. Flexer, B. K. (1984). Predicting eighth-grade algebra achievement. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 352-360.
11. Frederick, W. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1980). Learning as a function of time. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 183-194.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-48.
13. Gardner, R., III, Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. H. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63-71.
14. Gaver, D., & Richards, H. C. (1979). Dimensions of naturalistic observation for the predication of academic success. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 123-127.
15. Gettinger, M. G. (1985). Time allocated and time spent relative to time needed for learning as determinants of achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 3-11.
16. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
17. Hoge, R. D., & Luce, S. (1979). Predicting academic achievement from classroom behavior. Review of Educational Research, 49, 479-496.
18. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75-94.
19. Liao, Y. (1992). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 367-380.
20. Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1985). Implementing curriculum-based measurement in special and regular education settings. Exceptional Children, 52, 266-276.
21. Mathiasen, R. E. (1984). Predicting college academic achievement: A research review. College Student Journal, 18, 380-386.
22. McKenzie, G. R., & Henry, M. (1979). Effects of test-like events on on-task behavior, test anxiety, and achievement in a classroom rule-learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 370-374.
23. Narayan, J. S., Heward, W. L., Gardner, R., III, Courson, F. H., & Omness, C. K. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 483-490.
24. Pratton, J., & Hales, L. W. (1986). The effect of active participation on student learning. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 210-215.
25. Robinson, S. L., DePascale, C., & Roberts, F. (1989). Computer-delivered feedback in group-based instruction: Effects for learning disabled students in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, 28-35.
26. Rosenshine, B. V., & Berliner, D. C. (1978). Academic engaged time. British Journal of Teacher Education, 4, 3-16.
27. Smith, N. M. (1979). Allocation of time and achievement in elementary social studies. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 231-236.
28. Smyth, W. J. (1985). A context for the study of time and instruction. In C. W. Fisher & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspectives on instructional time (pp. 3-27). New York: Longman.
29. Thurlow, M., Graden, J., Greener, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1983). LD and non-LD students' opportunities to learn. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 172-183.
30. Vockell, E. L. (1987). The computer and academic learning time. Clearing House, 61, 72-75.
31. Walberg, H. J. (1988). Synthesis of research on time and learning. Educational Leadership, 45, 76-85.
32. Walberg, H. J., Niemiec, R. P., & Frederick, N. C. (1994). Productive curriculum time. Peabody Journal of Education, 69, 86-100.
33. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.
34. Wesson, C., Wilson, R., & Mandlebaum, L. H. (1988). Learning games for active student responding. Teaching Exceptional Children, 20, 12-14.
35. West, R. C., & Marcotte, D. R. (1993-1994). The effects of an integrated learning system using incremental time allotments on ninth grade algebra achievement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 22, 283-294.
36. Young, D. J., Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Science achievement and educational productivity: A hierarchical linear model. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 272-278.