|
Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 479-491
|
Comparison of different methods of obtaining orthostatic vital signs
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT;
BODY POSTURE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROSSOVER PROCEDURE;
DIASTOLE;
EXERCISE TEST;
FEMALE;
HEART RATE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
NURSING;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PULSE RATE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
STANDARD;
SUPINE POSITION;
SYSTOLE;
TIME;
VALIDATION STUDY;
ADULT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
BLOOD PRESSURE;
BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION;
CROSS-OVER STUDIES;
DIASTOLE;
EXERCISE TEST;
FEMALE;
HEART RATE;
HUMANS;
HYPOTENSION, ORTHOSTATIC;
MALE;
NURSING ASSESSMENT;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
POSTURE;
PULSE;
SUPINE POSITION;
SYSTOLE;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 0034334558
PISSN: 10547738
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/10547730022158708 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (10)
|