Divided Attention during Encoding and Retrieval: Differential Control Effects?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1744-1749

  Craik, Fergus I M ^a   Naveh Benjamin, Moshe ^a,b   Ishaik, Galit ^a   Anderson, Nicole D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MENTAL RECALL;

EID: 0034331844     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1744     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson, C. M. B., & Craik, F. I. M. (1974). The effect of a concurrent task on recall from primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 107-113.
2. Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 518-540.
3. Baddeley, A. D., Scott, D., Drynan, R., & Smith, J. C. (1969). Short-term memory and the limited capacity hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 51-55.
4. Birnbaum, I. M., Parker, E. S., Hartley, J. T., & Noble, E. P. (1978). Alcohol and memory: Retrieval processes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 325-335.
5. Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Similarities between the effects of aging and alcoholic intoxication on memory performance, construed within a "levels of processing" framework. In I. M. Birnbaum & E. S. Parker (Eds.), Alcohol and human memory (pp. 9-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Craik, F. I. M. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In F. Klix, J. Hoffmann, & E. van der Meer (Eds.), Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 152-161). Berlin: Verlag.
7. Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 302, 341-359.
8. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
9. Fernandes, M. A., & Moscovitch, M. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 155-176.
10. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
11. Johnston, W. A., Greenberg, S. N., Fisher, R. P., & Martin, D. W. (1970). Divided attention: A vehicle for monitoring memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 164-171.
12. Johnston, W. A., Griffith, D., & Wagstaff, R. R. (1972). Speed, accuracy, and ease of recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 512-520.
13. Kellogg, R. T., Cocklin, T., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1982). Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 183-198.
14. Kolers, P. A. (1973). Remembering operations. Memory & Cognition, 1, 347-355.
15. Kolers, P. A. (1979). A pattern-analyzing basis of recognition. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 363-384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
17. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 413-419.
18. Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Gavrilescu, D., & Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28, 965-976.
19. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Guez, J. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1461-1482.
20. Nilsson, L. G., Bäckman, L., & Karlsson, T. (1989). Priming and cued recall in elderly, alcohol-intoxicated and sleep-deprived subjects: A case of functionally similar memory deficits. Psychological Medicine, 19, 423-433.
21. Roediger, H. L., III, Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Trumbo, D., & Milone, F. (1971). Primary task performance as a function of encoding, retention, and recall in a secondary task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 273-279.
23. Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., & Houle, S. (1994). Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 2016-2020.
24. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.