Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 521-527

  Buchanan, Tom ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COURTSHIP; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; PERSONALITY; RESEARCH; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY;

ADULT; BEAUTY; COURTSHIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; JUDGMENT; MALE; PERSONALITY; RESEARCH; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY;

EID: 0034331515     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200824     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. BANYARD, P., & HUNT, N. (2000). Reporting research: Something missing? The Psychologist, 13, 68-71.
2. BIRNBAUM, M. H. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet. Psychological Science, 10, 399-407.
3. BIRNBAUM, M. H. (2000). SurveyWiz and FactorWiz: JavaScript Web pages that make HTML forms for research on the Internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 339-346.
4. BUCHANAN, T. (2000). Potential of the Internet for personality research. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 121-140). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. BUCHANAN, T., & SMITH, J. L. (1999a). Research on the Internet: Validation of a World-Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 565-571.
6. BUCHANAN, T., & SMITH, J. L. (1999b). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World-Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125-144.
7. DAVIS, R. N. (1999). Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: Comparison with traditional methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 572-577.
8. DEBONO, K. G., & SNYDER, M. (1989). Understanding consumer decision-making processes: The role of form and function in product evaluation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 416-424.
9. GANGESTAD, S. W., & SNYDER, M. (1985). "To carve nature at its joints": On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317-340.
10. GANGESTAD, S. W., & SNYDER, M. (1991). Taxonomic analysis redux: Some statistical considerations for testing a latent class model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61, 141-146.
11. GLICK, P. (1985). Orientations toward relationships: Choosing a situation in which to begin a relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 544-562.
12. CLICK, P., DEMOREST, J. A., & HOTZE, C. A. (1988). Self-monitoring and beliefs about partner compatibility in romantic relationships. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 485-494.
13. GONZALES, M. H., & MEYERS, S. A. (1993). "Your mother would like me": Self-presentation in the personals ads of heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 131-142.
14. HEWSON, C. M., LAURENT, D., & VOGEL, C. M. (1996). Proper methodologies for psychological and sociological studies conducted via the Internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 186-191.
15. JOINSON, A. N. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Net. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology of the Internet (pp. 43-60). New York: Academic Press.
16. JOINSON, A. N. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 433-438.
17. JOINSON, A. N., & BUCHANAN, T. (in press). Doing educational psychology research on the Internet. In C. Wolfe (Ed.), Teaching and learning on the World Wide Web. San Diego: Academic Press.
18. KRANTZ, J. H., BALLARD, J., & SCHER, J. (1997). Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 264-269.
19. KRANTZ, J. H., & DALAL, R. (2000). Validity of Web-based psychological research. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 35-60). San Diego: Academic Press.
20. LEVINE, S., ANCILL, R. J., & ROBERTS, A. P. (1988). Assessment of suicide risk by computer-delivered self-rating questionnaire: Preliminary findings. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 80, 216-220.
21. MCKENNA, K. Y., & BARGH, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity "demarginalization" through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.
22. MCNEMAR, Q. (1946). Opinion-attitude methodology. Psychological Bulletin, 43, 289-374.
23. MUSCH, J., & REIPS, U.-D. (2000). A brief history of Web experimenting. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 61-87). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. PAGANI, D., & LOMBARDI, L. (2000). An intercultural examination of facial features communicating surprise. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 169-194). San Diego: Academic Press.
25. PASVEER, K. A., & ELLARD, J. H. (1998). The making of a personality inventory: Help from the WWW. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 309-313.
26. PINES, A. M. (1998). A prospective study of personality and gender differences in romantic attraction. Personality & Individual Differences, 25, 147-157.
27. REIPS, U.-D. (1996. October). Experimenting in the World-Wide Web. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference, Chicago.
28. REIPS, U.-D. (2000). The Web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In M. H. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 89-117). San Diego: Academic Press.
29. ROSENFELD, P., GIACALONE, R. A., KNOUSE, S. B., DOHERTY, L. M., VICINO, S. M., KANTOR, J., & GREAVES, J. (1991). Impression management, candor and microcomputer-based organizational surveys: An individual differences approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 23-32.
30. SCHMIDT, W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 274-279.
31. SCHWARZER, R., MUELLER, J., & GREENGLASS, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived self-efficacy on the Internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 12, 145-161.
32. SENIOR, C., PHILLIPS, M. L., BARNES, J., & DAVID, A. S. (1999). An investigation into the perception of dominance from schematic faces: A study using the World-Wide Web. Behavior Research Methods, Instrument, & Computers, 31, 341-346.
33. SIEVER, M. D. (1994). Sexual orientation and gender as factors in socio-culturally acquired vulnerability to body dissatisfaction and eating disorders. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 62, 252-260.
34. SMITH, M. A., & LEIGH, B. (1997). Virtual subjects: Using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 496-505.
35. SNYDER, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
36. SNYDER, M. (1987). Public appearances/private realities. New York: W. H. Freeman.
37. SNYDER, M., BERSCHEID, E., & CLICK, P. (1985). Focusing on the exterior and the interior: Two investigations of the initiation of personal relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48, 1427-1439.
38. SNYDER, M., BERSCHEID, E., & MATWYCHUK, A. (1988). Orientations toward personnel selection: Differential reliance on appearance and personality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 972-979.
39. SNYDER, M., & GANGESTAD, S. W. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.
40. STONES, A., & PERRY, D. (1997). Survey questionnaire data on panic attacks gathered using the World Wide Web. Depression & Anxiety, 6, 86-87.
41. SZABO, A., & FRENKL, R. (1996). Consideration of research on Internet: Guidelines and implications for human movement studies. Clinical Kinesiology, 50, 58-65.