Data processing in music performance research: Using structural information to improve score-performance matching

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 546-554

  Heijink, Hank ^a   Windsor, Luke ^b   Desain, Peter ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MUSIC; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; HUMANS; MUSIC; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034330303     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200827     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. CORMEN, T. H., LEISERSON, C. E., & RIVEST, R. L. (1990). Introduction to algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. DANNENBERG, R. (1984). An on-line algorithm for real-time accompaniment. In Proceedings of the 1984 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 193-198). San Francisco: ICMA.
3. DANNENBERG, R., & MUKAINO, H. (1988). New techniques for enhanced quality of computer accompaniment. In Proceedings of the 1988 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 243-249). San Francisco: ICMA.
4. DESAIN, P., & HONING, H. (1992). Music, mind and machine: Studies in computer music, music cognition and artificial intelligence. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
5. DESAIN, P., HONING, H., & HEIJINK, H. ( 1997). Robust score-performance matching: Taking advantage of structural information. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 337-340). San Francisco: ICMA.
6. GABRIELSSON, A. (1999). The performance of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 501-602). San Diego: Academic Press.
7. HEIJINK, H. (1996). Matching scores and performances. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nijmegen. (Available in html from www. nici.kun.nl/mmm)
8. HEIJINK, H., DESAIN, P., HONING, H., & WINDSOR, L. (2000). Make me a match: An evaluation of different approaches to score-performance matching. Computer Music Journal, 24(1), 43-56.
9. HONING, H. (1990). POCO: An environment for analyzing, modifying, and generating expression in music. In Proceedings of the 1990 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 364-368). San Francisco: ICMA.
10. HOSHISHIBA, T., HORIGUCHI, S., & FUJINAGA, I. (1996). Study of expression and individuality in music performance using normative data derived from MIDI recordings of piano music. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 465-470). Montreal: McGill University, Faculty of Music.
11. INTERNATIONAL MIDI ASSOCIATION (1983). MIDI musical instrument digital interface specification 1.0. Los Angeles: Author.
12. LARGE, E. W. (1993). Dynamic programming for the analysis of serial behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 238-241.
13. PALMER, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115-138.
14. PALMER, C., & VAN DE SANDE, C. (1993). Units of knowledge in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 457-470.
15. PUCKETTE, M., & LIPPE, C. (1992). Score following in practice. In Proceedings of the 1992 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 182-185). San Francisco.
16. ROADS, C. ( 1996). The computer music tutorial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. VANTOMME, J. D. (1995). Score following by temporal pattern. Computer Music Journal, 19(3), 50-59.