|
Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 505-511
|
Retentive strength of an amalgam bonding agent: chemical vs light vs dual curing.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;
CLEARFIL LINER BOND 2;
COPALITE;
DENTAL ALLOY;
DENTIN BONDING AGENT;
METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
PAINT;
PLANT RESIN;
PROTECT LINER F;
RESIN CEMENT;
TYTIN;
WATER;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
CLASSIFICATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL CARE;
DENTAL SURGERY;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
LIGHT;
MATERIALS TESTING;
MECHANICAL STRESS;
MOLAR TOOTH;
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY;
STATISTICAL MODEL;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
THERMODYNAMICS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL;
DENTAL ALLOYS;
DENTAL AMALGAM;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL CAVITY LINING;
DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION;
DENTAL MATERIALS;
DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS;
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS;
HUMANS;
LIGHT;
LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS;
MATERIALS TESTING;
METHACRYLATES;
MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL;
MOLAR;
PAINT;
RESIN CEMENTS;
RESINS, PLANT;
STRESS, MECHANICAL;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
THERMODYNAMICS;
WATER;
|
EID: 0034330096
PISSN: 03617734
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|