Immediate urodynamic and anatomic response to colposuspension in female Beagles

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 61, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 1353-1357

  Rawlings, Clarence A ^a   Mahaffey, Mary B ^a   Chernosky, Adriene ^a   Huzella, Louis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HALOTHANE; INHALATION ANESTHETIC AGENT; THIOPENTAL;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLADDER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSCOPY; DOG; DOG DISEASE; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; URETHRA; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; VAGINA;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANIMALS; COLPOSCOPY; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; FEMALE; HALOTHANE; THIOPENTAL; URETHRA; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; VAGINA;

EID: 0034327916     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.1353     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Holt PE. Long-term evaluation of colposuspension in the treatment of urinary incontinence due to incompetence of the urethral sphincter mechanism in the bitch. Vet Rec 1990;127:537-542.
2. Holt PE, Gregory SP. Can urethral pressure profilometry predict the response to colposuspension in bitches? Vet Rec 1991;128:281-282.
3. Holt PE, Stone EA. Colposuspension for urinary incontinence. In: Bojrab MJ, ed. Current techniques in small animal surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co, 1997;455-459.
4. Gregory SP, Holt PE. The immediate effect of colposuspension on resting and stressed urethral pressure profiles in anaesthetized incontinent bitches. Vet Surg 1994;23:330-340.
5. McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J, et al. Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 1993;150:1452-1454.
6. Haab F, Zimmern PE, Leach GE. Female stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: recognition and management. J Urol 1996;156:3-17.
7. Nitti VW, Combs AJ. Correlation of valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women. J Urol 1996;155:281-285.
8. Leach GE, Dmochowski RR, Appell RA, et al. Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association. J Urol 1997;158:875-880.
9. Massey JA, Anderson RS, Abrams P. Mechanisms of continence during raised intra-abdominal pressure. Br J Urol 1987;60: 529-531.
10. Rawlings CA, Coates JR, Chernosky A, et al. Stress leak point pressures and urethral pressure profile tests in clinically normal female dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:676-678.
11. Arnold S, Arnold P, Hubler M, et al. Urinary incontinence in spayed female dogs: frequency and breed predisposition. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 1989;131:259-263.
12. Holt PE. Urinary incontinence in the bitch due to sphincter mechanism incompetence: prevalence in referred dogs and retrospective analysis of sixty cases. J Small Anim Pract 1985;26:181-190.
13. Gregory SP. Developments in the understanding of the pathophysiology of urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence in the bitch. Br Vet J 1994;150:135-150.
14. Holt PE. Importance of urethral length, bladder neck position and vestibulovaginal stenosis in sphincter mechanism incompetence in the incontinent bitch. Res Vet Sci 1985;39:364-372.
15. Mahaffey MB, Barsanti JA, Barber DL, et al. Pelvic bladder in dogs without urinary incontinence. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1984;184: 1477-1479.
16. Richter KP, Ling GV. Clinical response and urethral pressure profile changes after phenylpropanolamine in dogs with primary sphincter incompetence. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985;187:605-611.
17. Holt PE. Urinary incontinence in the bitch due to sphincter mechanism incompetence: surgical treatment. J Small Anim Pract 1985;26:237-246.
18. Gregory SP, Holt PE, Parkinson TJ. Comparison of two catheter withdrawal speeds during simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry in anesthetized bitches. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:355-358.
19. Holt PE. Urethral pressure profilometry in the anaesthetised bitch: a comparison between double and single sensor recording. Res Vet Sci 1989;47:347-349.
20. Holt PE, Gibbs C, Wathes CM. Simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry using a microtip transducer catheter in the bitch: effects of bitch position and transducer orientation. Neurol Urodyn 1990;9:281-296.
21. Richter KP, Ling GV. Effects of xylazine on the urethral pressure profile of healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:1881-1886.
22. Barsanti JA, Finco DR, Brown J. Effect of atropine on cystometry and urethral pressure profilometry in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:112-114.
23. Combrisson H, Robain G, Cotard JP. Comparative effects of xylazine and propofol on the urethral pressure profile of healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:1986-1989.
24. Arnold S, Chew DJ, Hubler M, et al. Reproducibility of urethral pressure profiles in clinically normal sexually intact female dogs by use of microtransducer catheters. Am J Vet Res 1993;54: 1347-1351.
25. Rosin A, Rosin E, Oliver J. Canine urethral pressure profile. Am J Vet Res 1980;41:1113-1116.
26. Holt PE. Simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry: comparison between continent and incontinent bitches. J Small Anim Pract 1988;29:761-769.
27. Gookin JL, Stone EA, Sharp NJ. Urinary incontinence in dogs and cats. Part I. Urethral pressure profilometry. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1996;18:407-426.
28. Gookin JL, Stone EA, Sharp NJ. Urinary incontinence in dogs and cats. Part II. Diagnosis and management. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1996;18:525-547.
29. Graber P, Laurent G, Tanagho EA. Effect of abdominal pressure rise on the urethral profile. An experimental study on dogs. Invest Urol 1974;12:57-64.
30. McGuire EJ, Herlihy E. The influence of urethral position on urinary continence. Invest Urol 1977;15:205-207.
31. Kil PJ, Hoekstra JW, van der Meijden AP, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography and urodynamic evaluation after suspension operations: comparison among the Gittes, Stamey and Burch Suspensions. J Urol 1991;146:132-136.