Substitutes for human cadaveric bone in maxillofacial rigid fixation research

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 574-580

  Bredbenner, Todd L ^a   Haug, Richard H ^b,c  

^a METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPOXY RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL RESEARCH; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; RIB; SWINE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TORQUE; WOOD;

ADULT; AGED; ANIMALS; BONE SCREWS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CADAVER; CATTLE; DENTAL RESEARCH; DEVICE REMOVAL; EPOXY RESINS; HUMANS; JAW FIXATION TECHNIQUES; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; RIBS; SWINE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TORQUE; WOOD;

EID: 0034324072     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/moe.2000.111025     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ardary WC, Tracy DJ, Brownridge GW, Urata MM. Comparative evaluation of screw configuration on the stability of the sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:125-9.
2. Bouwman JPB, Tuinzing DB, Kostense PJ. A comparative in vitro study on fixation of sagittal split osteotomies with Würzburg screws, Champy miniplates, and Biofix (biodegradable) rods. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;23:46-8.
3. Schwimmer A, Greenberg AM, Kummer F, Kaynar A. The effect of screw size and insertion technique on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:45-8.
4. Kim HC, Essaki S, Kameyama T. Comparison of screw placement patterns on the rigidity of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy: technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1995;23:54-6.
5. Kohn DH, Richmond EM, Dootz ER, Feinberg SE, Pietrzak WS. In vitro comparison of parameters affecting the fixation strength of sagittal split osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1374-83.
6. Dechow PC, Nail GA, Schwartz-Dabney CL, Ashman RB. Elastic properties of human supraorbital and mandibular bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993;90:291-306.
7. King AI, Viano DC, Mizeres N, States JD. Humanitarian benefits of cadaver research on injury prevention. J Trauma 1995;38:564-9.
8. O'Neill O. Medical and scientific uses of human tissue [editorial]. J Med Ethics 1996;22:5-7.
9. Cavanaugh JM, King AI. Control of transmission of HIV and other bloodborne pathogens in biomechanical cadaveric testing. J Orthop Res 1990;8:159-66.
10. Gorup JM, Merola AA, Bono CM, Zipnick RI, Morganstern W, Shin TM, et al. Technique for the harvesting of human cadaveric spines. Spine 1998;23:2222-5.
11. Crofts C, Trowbridge A, Maung Aung T, Brook IM. A comparative in vitro study of fixation of mandibular fractures with paraskeletal clamps for screw plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:461-6.
12. Anucul B, Waite PD, Lemons JE. In vitro strength analysis of sagittal split osteotomy fixation: noncompression monocortical plates versus bicortical position screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:1295-9.
13. Boyle J, Frost DE, Foley WL, Grady JJ. Comparison between uniaxial pull-out tests and torque measure of 2.0 mm self-tapping screws. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1993;8:129-33.
14. Haug RH. The effects of screw number and length on two methods of tension band plating. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:159-62.
15. Murphy M, Haug RH, Barber JE. A comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:489-94.
16. Sikes JW, Smith BR, Mukherjee DP, Coward KA. Comparison of fixation strength of locking head and conventional screws in fracture reconstruction models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:468-73.
17. Kroon F, Mathison M, Cordez JR, Rahn BA. The use of the miniplates in mandibular fractures: an in vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1991;19:235-82.
18. Dichard A, Klotch D. Testing biomechanical strength of repairs for the mandibular angle fracture. Laryngoscope 1994;104:201-8.
19. Shetty V, McBrearty D, Fourney M, Caputo AA. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:791-801.
20. Shetty V, Freymiller E, McBrearty D, Caputo AA. Functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies: effects of positional screw size and placement configuration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:601-9.
21. Haug RH, Nuveen EJ, Barber E, Storoe W. An in vitro evaluation of distractors used for osteogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:648-59.
22. Haug RH, Barber E, Punjabi AP. An in vitro comparison of the effect of number and pattern on positional screws on load resistance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:300-8.
23. American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual book of ASTM Standards. Vol 13.01. Philadelphia: The Society; 1998.
24. Rho JY. Mechanical properties of human cortical and cancellous bone [dissertation]. Dallas (TX): University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; 1991.
25. Currey JD, Brear K, Zioupos P, Reilly GC. Effect of formaldehyde fixation on some mechanical properties of bovine bone. Biomaterials 1995;16:1267-71.
26. Hamer AJ, Strachan JR, Black MM, Ibbotson CJ, Stockley I, Elson RA. Biomechanical properties of cortical allograft bone using a new method of bone strength measurement. A comparison of fresh, fresh-frozen and irradiated bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-B:363-8.