Some computational problems arising in adaptive optics imaging systems

Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

Volumn 123, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 467-487

  Plemmons, Robert J ^a   Pauca, Victor P ^b  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive optics control; Covariance matrix computations; Eigenvalues; Fast Hankel transforms; Imaging through turbulence; Structured matrices

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE; COMPUTER CONTROL; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MIRRORS; OPTICAL TELESCOPES; OPTICS;

ADAPTIVE OPTICS CONTROL; ATMOSPHERIC IMAGING; COVARIANCE MATRIX; FAST HANKEL TRANSFORMS; STRUCTURED MATRICES;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 0034319899     PISSN: 03770427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00410-6     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bunse-Gerstner A., Byers R., Mehrmann V. Numerical methods for simultaneous diagonalization. SIAM. J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 14:1993;927-949.
2. Debnath L. Integral Transforms and their Applications. 1995;CRC Press, New York.
3. Ellerbroek B.L. First-order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensation in extended field-of-view astronomical telescopes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 11:1994;783-805.
4. Ellerbroek B.L. Including outer scale effects in zonal adaptive optics calculations. Appl. Opt. 36(36):1997;9456-9467.
5. Ellerbroek B.L., Tyler D.W. Adaptive optics sky coverage calculations for the gemini-north telescope. Proc. Astron. Soc. Pac. 110:1998;165-185.
6. Ellerbroek B.L., Van Loan C., Pitsianis N., Plemmons R.J. Optimizing closed-loop adaptive optics performance using multiple control bandwidths. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 11:1994;2871-2886.
7. Golub G.H., Van Loan C. Matrix Computations. 3rd Edition:1996;The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
8. Greengard L., Rokhlin V. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 135:1997;280-292.
9. S. Kapur, V. Rokhlin, An algorithm for the fast Hankel transform, Technical Report 1045, Computer Science Department, Yale University, 1995.
10. Milman M., Fijany A. Wave-front control algorithms and analysis for a dense adaptive optics system with segmented deformable mirror. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 13:1996;365-378.
11. Nelson J. Reinventing the telescope. Popular Science. 85:1995;57-59.
12. Pauca V.P., Ellerbroek B.L., Pitsianis N., Plemmons R.J., Sun X. Performance modeling of adaptive-optics imaging systems using fast Hankel transforms. Adv. Signal Process. Algorithms, Architectures, and Implementations VIII. 3461:1998;339-347.
13. V.P. Pauca, R.J. Plemmons, B.L. Ellerbroek, X. Sun, Efficient two-parameter Hankel transforms in adaptive optics system evaluations, Lin. Algebra Appl., to appear.
14. Pitsianis N.P., Ellerbroek B.L., Van Loan C., Plemmons R.J. Jacobi-like method for a control algorithm in adaptive-optics imaging. Adv. Signal Process. Algorithms, Architectures, and Implementations VIII. 3461:1998;296-307.
15. Roggemann M.C., Welsh B. Imaging Through Turbulence. 1996;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Rokhlin V. End-point corrected trapezoidal quadrature rules for singular functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 20:1990;51-62.
17. Sasiela R.J. Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Turbulence. 1994;Springer, Berlin.
18. Smith R.A. Seeing the universe through new eyes. National Geographic Mag. 185(1):1994;2-41.
19. X. Sun, V.P. Pauca, A note on fast Hankel transforms, Technical report, Duke University, 1999.
20. Tyson R.K. Principles of Adaptive Optics. 2nd Edition:1998;Academic Press, San Diego.