Surface charge induced modifications of the structure and dynamics of mixed dipolar liquids at solid-liquid interfaces: A molecular dynamics simulation study

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 113, Issue 19, 2000, Pages 8817-8826

  Senapati, Sanjib ^a   Chandra, Amalendu ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFUSION; ELECTROSTRICTION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; POLARIZATION; SOLVENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BINARY STOCKMAYER LIQUIDS; SURFACE CHARGE;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 0034319698     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1318773     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic, New York, 1992).
2. M. F. Toney, J. N. Howard, J. Richer, G. L. Borges, D. G. Wiesler, D. Yee, and L. D. Sorensen, Nature (London) 368, 444 (1994).
3. M. F. Toney, J. N. Howard, J. Richer, G. L. Borges, J. G. Gordon, O. R. Melroy, D. G. Wiesler, D. Yee, and L. D. Sorensen, Surf. Sci. 335, 326 (1995).
4. K. Ataka, T. Yotsuyanagi, and M. Osawa, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 10664 (1996).
5. S.-B. Zhu and G. W. Robinson, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 1403 (1991).
6. X. Xia and M. L. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3193 (1995): I-C. Yeh and M. L. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 10491 (2000).
7. X. Xia and M. L. Berkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3193 (1995): I-C. Yeh and M. L. Berkowitz, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 10491 (2000).
8. S. H. Lee, J. C. Rasaiah, and J. B. Hubbard, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5232 (1986); 86, 2383 (1987).
9. S. H. Lee, J. C. Rasaiah, and J. B. Hubbard, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5232 (1986); 86, 2383 (1987).
10. S. Senapati and A. Chandra, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 455, 1 (1998).
11. A. A. Gardner and J. P. Valleau, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 4171 (1987).
12. G. M. Torrie, P. G. Kusalik, and G. N. Patey, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 7826 (1988).
13. G. M. Torrie, P. G. Kusalik, and G. N. Patey, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3285 (1988).
14. V. Russier, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 4491 (1989).
15. M. J. Booth, D. Duh, and A. D. J. Haymet, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 7925 (1994).
16. R. Akiyama and F. Hirata, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 4904 (1998).
17. G. Rickayzen and M. J. Grimson, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 78, 893 (1982).
18. M. Moradi and G. Rickayzen, Mol. Phys. 68, 903 (1989).
19. P. Frodl and S. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. E 48, 3741 (1993).
20. C. E. Woodward and S. Nordholm, Mol. Phys. 60, 415 (1987).
21. C. E. Woodward and S. Nordholm, Mol. Phys. 60, 441 (1987).
22. C. N. Patra and S. K. Ghosh, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 2752 (1997).
23. D. Das, S. Senapati, and A. Chandra, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8129 (1999).
24. A. Chandra, S. Senapati, and D. Sudha, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10439 (1998).
25. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. R. Grigera, and T. P. Straatsma, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269 (1987).
26. P. G. Kusalik and I. M. Svishchev, Science 265, 1219 (1994); I. M. Svishchev, P. G. Kusalik, J. Wang, and R. J. Boyd, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 4742 (1996).
27. P. G. Kusalik and I. M. Svishchev, Science 265, 1219 (1994); I. M. Svishchev, P. G. Kusalik, J. Wang, and R. J. Boyd, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 4742 (1996).
28. M. Kiselev and K. Heinzinger, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 650 (1996).
29. S. Senapati and A. Chandra, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 10467 (2000).
30. S. Senapati and A. Chandra, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 377 (2000).
31. S. Senapati and A. Chandra, Chem. Phys. 242, 353 (1999).
32. C. Y. Lee, J. A. McCammon, and P. J, Rossky, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 4448 (1984).
33. L. Zhang, H. T. Davis, D. M. Kroll, and H. S. White, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 2878 (1995).
34. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, London, 1987).
35. J. Shelley and G. N. Patey, Mol. Phys. 88, 385 (1996).
36. S. Senapati and A. Chandra, Chem. Phys. 231, 65 (1998).
37. S. Senapati and A. Chandra, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 1223 (1999).
38. J. P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids (Academic, London, 1986).
39. E. Spohr, Chem. Phys. 141, 87 (1990).
40. For example, for the equimolar mixture the perpendicular and parallel components of the translational diffusion coefficients of molecules in region II differ at the most by 15% from the corresponding bulk values. The rotational diffusion coefficients in the two regions are even closer, the difference in not more than 2% of the bulk values.