An exact solution to continuous-time mixed H2/H∞ control problems

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 2095-2101

  Sznaier, M ^a   Rotstein, H ^b   Bu, Juanyu ^a   Sideris, A ^c  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

H control; H2 control; Multiobjective control

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; DISCRETE TIME CONTROL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SYSTEM STABILITY; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

CONTINUOUS TIME MIXED CONTROL; MULTIOBJECTIVE CONTROL;

OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034318324     PISSN: 00189286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/9.887633     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. B. D. O. Anderson and J. B. Moore, Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990.
2. ∞ control," in Proc. 1994 Amer. Control Conf., 1994, pp. 1608-1612.
3. ∞ performance bound: A Riccati equation approach," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 293-305, 1989.
4. J. Doyle, "Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-23, no. 4, pp. 756-757, 1978.
5. 2 performance using multiplier theory," SIAM J. Contr. Optim., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 160-177, 1997.
6. ∞ optimal control via finite dimensional Q parametrization and linear matrix inequalities," in Proc. 1998 ACC, pp. 3244-3249.
7. ∞ control: A convex optimization approach," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 824-837, 1991.
8. Y. W. Lee, Statistical Theory of Communications New York: Wiley, 1960.
9. ∞ control," in Proc. 33rd IEEE CDC, Lake Buena Vista, FL, 1994, pp. 3173-3174.
10. F. Paganini, "Sets and constraints in the analysis of uncertain systems," Ph.D. dissertation, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, 1995.
11. B. Palka, An Introduction to Complex Function Theory, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
12. P. Parrilo, M. Sznaier, R. S. Peña, and T. Inanc, "Mixed time/frequency domain robust identification," Automatica, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1375-1389, Nov. 1998.
13. ∞ problems via convex optimization," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 43, pp. 1475-1480, Nov. 1998.
14. ∞-norm constraint," Automatica, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 355-367, 1997.
15. ∞ optimization with time domain constraints: The SISO case," preprint, 1996.
16. G. Stein and M. Athans, "The LQG/LTR procedure for multivariable feedback control design," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-32, no. 2, 1987.
17. 2 problem: A worst-case design," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1358-1370, 1993.
18. ∞ control," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1054-1062, 1995.
19. C. Scherer, P. Gahinet, and M. Chilali, "Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 896-911, 1997.
20. R. S. S. Peña and M. Sznaier, Robust Systems Theory and Applications. New York: Wiley, 1998.
21. ∞ problems via convex optimization," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2511-2517, 1994.
22. 2 analysis?," Automatica, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 957-963, July 2000.
23. S. Tangirala, A. Ray, and M. Carpino, "Damage mitigating control of mechanical structures: Experimental verification of the concept," in Proc. 1995 ACC, Seattle, WA, June 21-23, 1995, pp. 4106-4110.
24. ∞ performance objectives I: Robust performance analysis," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1564-1574, 1994.