Determination of the dielectric constant of nanoparticles. 1. Dielectric measurements of buckminsterfullerene solutions

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 104, Issue 47, 2000, Pages 11058-11065

  Snyder, Chad R ^a   Douglas, Jack F ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FILLERS; MOLECULAR BEAMS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PERMITTIVITY; SOLVENTS; TOLUENE;

POLAR SOLVENTS;

FULLERENES;

EID: 0034317780     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp002024y     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Maxwell, J. C. A Treatise On Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed.; Dover: New York, 1954; Vol. 1, Chapter 9.
2. Rayleigh, J. W. S. Philos. Mag. 1892, 34, 481.
3. Bmggeman, D. A. G. Ann. Phys. 1935, 24, 636.
4. Böttcher, C. J. F. Réel. Trav. Chim. Pays-Basl 1945, 64, 47.
5. Hsu, W. Y.; Gierke, T. D.; Molnar, C. J. Macromoleciiles 1983, 16, 1945.
6. Landau, L. D.; Lifshitz, E. M.; Pitaevski, L. P. Electrodynamics of Continuons Media, 2nd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, 1984; Chapter 2.
7. Brown, W. F., Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1955, 23, 1514.
8. Douglas, J. F.; Garboczi, E. J. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1995, 9l, 85.
9. Garboczi, E. J.; Douglas, J. F. Phys. Rev. E 1996, 97, 85.
10. Schiffer, M.; Szegö, G. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1949, 67, 130.
11. Mansfield, M. L.; Douglas, J. F. In preparation. The method of these calculations is similar to previous calculations of capacity by random walk methods.
12. Landau, L. D.; Lifshitz, E. M. The Classical Theory of Fields, 4th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, 1975.
13. Onsager, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1936, 58, 1486.
14. Frank, F. C. Proc. R. Soc. (London) 1935, 152A, 171.
15. Higasi, K. Sei. Pap. Inst. Phys. Chem. Res. (Tokyo) 1936, 28, 284.
16. Hedestrand, G. Z Phys. Chem. 1929, 2B, 428.
17. Böttcher, C. J. F. Phys. 1938, 5, 635.
18. Halverstadt, I. F.; Kumler, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942,64,2988.
19. Smith, J. W. Sei. Prog. 1948, 36, 483.
20. Few, A. V.; Smith, J. W. J. Chem. Soc. 1949, 2781.
21. Guggenheim, E. A. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1951, 47, 573.
22. Gopala Krishna, K. V. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1957, 53, 767.
23. Krishna, B.; Srivastava, K. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1960, 32, 663.
24. Estok, G. K.; Sood, S. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1962, 66, 1372.
25. Klages, G.; Knobloch, P. Z. Naturforsch. 1965, 20A, 580.
26. Schönhals, A.; Stauga, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 5130.
27. Barut, G.; Pissis, P.; Pelster, R.; Nimtz, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 3543.
28. Sinha, G. P.; Aliev, F. M. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58, 2001.
29. Rossouw, C. J.; Donnelly, S. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 2960.
30. Buffat, Ph.; Borel, J.-P. Phys. Rev. A 1976, 13, 2287.
31. Pevzner, B.; Hebard, A. F.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55, 16439.
32. Antoine, R.; Dugourd, Ph.; Rayane, D.; Benichou, E.; Broyer, M.; Chandezon, F.; Guet, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 9771.
33. Chung, F.; Sternberg, S. Am. Sei. 1993, 81, 56.
34. Schwanz, L. M.; Garboczi, E. J.; Bentz, D. P. J. Appl. Phys. 1995, 78, 5898.
35. Garboczi, E. J.; Benyman, J. G. Cone. Sei. Eng. 2000, 2, 88.
36. Lambin, Ph.; Lucas, A. A.; Vigneron, J.-P. Phys. Rev. B 1992,46, 1794.
37. Smyth, C. P. Dielectric Behavior and Structure; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1955; Chapters I and IV.
38. Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999; Chapter 4.
39. Bonin, K. D.; Kresin/V. V. Electric-Dipole Polarizabilities of Atoms, Molecules and Clusters; World Scientific: New Jersey, 1997; Chapter 4.
40. Certain commercial materials and equipment are identified in this paper in order to specify adequately the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the items identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
41. Ruoff, R. S.; Tse, D. S.; Malhotra, R.; Lorents, D. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 3379.
42. Snyder, C. R.; Mopsik, F. I. Rev. Sei. Instrum. 1999, 70, 2424.
43. All reported uncertainties are the best estimate of two standard deviations in the experimental uncertainty.
44. Digital Precision Density Measurement System for Liquids and Gases, External Measuring Cells: Operating Instructions. Anton PAAR KG: Graz, Austria.
45. Note that the error bars in all of the plots are the best estimate of 2 standard deviations in the expanded standard uncertainty.
46. Nelson, R. D., Jr.; Lide, D. R., Jr.; Maryott, A. A. Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. Natl. r. Stand. (U.S.) 1967, 10.
47. Mopsik, F. I. J. Chem. Phys. 1969, 50, 2559. i
48. Ying, Q.; Marecek, J.; Chu, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 2665.
49. Rudalevige, T.; Francis, A. H.; Zand, R. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 702, 9797.
50. Nath, S.; Pal, H.; Palit, D. K.; Sapre, A. V.; Mittal, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 702, 10158.
51. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Weast, R. C., Ed.; CRC Press: Cleveland, 1971.
52. Bird, L. H.; Daly, E. F. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1939, 35, 588.
53. Curry, H. L.; Gilkerson, W. R. J. Am. Client. Soc. 1957, 79, 4021.
54. Flaherty, P. H.; Stem, K. H. J. Am. Client. Soc. 1958, SO, 1034.