Which are the competitors for a fusion power plant?

Fusion Engineering and Design

Volumn 49-50, Issue , 2000, Pages 33-39

  Miller, Ronald L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENERGY EFFICIENCY; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PERFORMANCE;

FUSION POWER PLANTS;

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

EID: 0034317555     PISSN: 09203796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00459-2     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Conn R.W., Najmabadi F., Tillack M.S. Prospects and issues for commercial fusion power systems. Fusion Eng. Des. 41:1998;337.
2. Miller R.L. Economic goals and requirements for competitive fusion energy. Fusion Eng. Des. 41:1998;393.
3. Toschi R. Nuclear fusion, an energy source. Fusion Eng. Des. 36:1997;1.
4. P.R. Portney, J. P. Weyant (Eds.), Discounting and Intergenerational Equity, Resources for the Future, 1999.
5. Ausubel J.H., Marchetti C. Elektron: electrical systems in retrospect and prospect, The Liberation of the Environment, DEDALUS. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 125:(3):1996;139.
6. Electricity Technology Roadmap - Electricity Supply, Vol. 2, Electric Power Research Institute report (January 1999); also The Electricity Technology Roadmap, EPRI Journal, 23 (6) (1998) 24.
7. Electricity Technology Roadmap - Electricity Supply, Vol. 2, Electric Power Research Institute report (January 1999); also The Electricity Technology Roadmap, EPRI Journal, 23 (6) (1998) 24.
8. Nakićenović N. Freeing energy from carbon, The Liberation of the Environment, DEDALUS. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 125:(3):1996;95.
9. Joosten J. US electric market restructuring: implications for nuclear plant operation and safety. Nucl. News. 42:(7):1999;41.
10. Dooley J.J. Unintended consequences: energy R&D in a deregulated energy market. Energy Policy. 25:(7):1998;547.
11. M.G. Morgan, S. F. Tierney, Research support for the power industry, Issues Sci. Technol., 15 (1) (1998) 81.
12. A.K. Dixit, R.S. Pindyck, Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, 1994.
13. Coy P. Exploiting uncertainty. Business Week. 7:1999;118.
14. International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 1998 Edition, IEA Paris (1998).
15. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 1999, US Department of Energy report DOE/EIA-0484(99) (1999).
16. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook 1999 With Projections Through 2020, US Department of Energy report DOE/ETA-0383(99) (1998).
17. N. Nakićenović, A. Grübler, A. McDonald (Eds.), Global Energy Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
18. Penner S.S. US Energy Supplies for the 21st Century. Energy. 23:(2):1998;71.
19. Sheffield J. World population and energy demand growth: the potential role of nuclear energy in an efficient world. Fusion Technol., Part 2. 34:(3):1996;281.
20. Penner S.S., Haraden J., Mates S. Long-term global energy supplies with acceptable environmental impacts. Energy. 17:(10):1992;883.
21. Perkins L.J. The role of inertial fusion energy in the energy marketplace of the 21st Century and beyond. Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 415:1998;44.
22. Moore T. Merchant plants drive market competition. EPRI J. 24:(2):1999;8.
23. R. Kasperson, Can Nuclear Power Gain Public Acceptance? Proc. 2nd MIT Int. Conf. on the Next Generation of Nuclear Power Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology report MIT-ANP-CP-002 (October 1993).
24. Hayden H.C. On being proud of nuclear waste. Nucl. News. 42:(6):1999;41.
25. International Atomic Energy Agency, Sustainable Development and Nuclear Power, IAEA report 97-04710 IAEA/PI/A/55e (November 1997).
26. Priddle R. Energy and sustainable development. IAEA Bull. 41/1:1999;2.
27. Touryan K.J. Renewable energy: rapidly maturing technology for the 21st century. J. Propulsion Power. 15:(2):1999;163.
28. M.L. Wald, New York Times news service (June 20, 1999).
29. Drennen T.E., Erickson J.D. Who will fuel China? Science. 279:1998;1483.
30. Kim S.H., Clarke J., Edmonds J. The economic value of fusion energy. Proc. 31st Intersoc. Energy Conversion Eng. Conf. 2:1996;814.
31. P. Lako, J.R. Ybema, A.J. Seebregts, The long-term potential of fusion power in Western Europe-MARKAL Scenarios until 2100, The Netherlands Energy Research Foundation (ECN) report ECN-C-98-071 (December 1998).
32. Ray H.B. Deregulation of electric generation revenue and the likey effect on nuclear power's future. Nucl. News. 427:1999;47.
33. Delene J.G. Advanced fission and fossil plant economics - implications for fusion. Fusion Technol., Part 2. 26:(3):1994;1105.
34. J.G. Delene, J. Sheffield, K.A. Williams, R.L. Reid, S. Hadley, An assessment of future electric power generation options and the implications for fusion-Revision: Oak Ridge National Laboratory report ORNL/TM-1999-243 (February 2000).
35. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency/International Energy Agency, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - Update (1998).
36. 2 emissions associated with the UWMAK-l and ARIES-RS DT-fusion power plants. Fusion Technol., Part 2. 34:(3):1998;358.
37. F. Najmabadi, the ARIES Team, Overview of ARIES-RS tokamak fusion power plant, Fusion Eng. Des. 41 (1998) 365.
38. Holdren J.P., Berwald D.H., Budnitz R.J., Crocker J.G., Delene J.G., Endicott R.D., Kazimi M.S., Krakowski R.A., Logan B.G., Schultz K.R. Exploring the competitive potential of magnetic fusion energy: The interaction of economics with safety and environmental characteristics. Fusion Technol. 13:(1):1988;7.
39. L.M. Waganer, Innovative, ultra-low-cost fabrication methods, Proc. 18th IEEE/NPSS Symp. Fusion Energy (1999) 99CH37050, p. 77.
40. Dolan T.J. Fusion power economy of scale. Fusion Technol. 24:(1):1993;97.
41. Perkins L.J. Complexity and availability for fusion power plants: the potential advantages of inertial fusion energy. J. Fusion Energy. 16:(4):1997;307.
42. Rogner H.-H., Khan A. Comparing energy options-the inter-agency DECADES project. IAEA Bull. 40:(1):1998;2.