Developing an evidence-based practice protocol: Implications for midwifery practice

Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 544-551

  Carr, Katherine Camacho ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034311241     PISSN: 15269523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1526-9523(00)00072-6     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. 1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services, 2nd edition. Washington (DC): Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
2. 2. Fullerton-Smith I. How members of the Cochrane Collaboration prepare and maintain systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Evidence-Based Medicine. 1995;1:7-8.
3. 3. American College of Nurse-Midwives. Clinical Bulletins. Washington (DC): ACNM, 1996, 1998, 1999.
4. 4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Technical bulletins. Washington (DC): ACOG, 1998.
5. 5. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Achieving consistent quality care: using evidence to guide practice, 1998. Washington (DC): AWHONN.
6. 6. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR program note: Clinical practice guideline development (AHCPR Publication No. 93-0023. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 1998.
7. 7. Rooks JP. Evidence-based practice and its application to childbirth care for low risk women. J Nurse Midwifery 1999;44:355-69.
8. 8. Gray J, Hayes RB, Sacket D, Cook D, Guyatt GH. Transferring evidence from research into practice: 3. Developing evidence-based clinical policy, 1997. American College of Physicians Journal Club 1997; 126(2):A14-A16.
9. 9. American College of Nurse-Midwives. Standards for the Practice of Nurse-Midwifery. Washington (DC): ACNM, 1993.
10. 10. Enkin M, Kierse JNC, Chalmers I. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
11. 11. Chalmers I. (Ed). Oxford database of perinatal trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
12. 12. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. BMJ Publishing Group, P.O. Box 295, London, WCIH 9TE, UK.
13. 13. Roberts R, Rosof B, Thompson T. Determining which practice guidelines really work. Contemporary Ob-Gyn, 1996; September: 31-39.
14. 14. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
15. 15. Office of Medical Education. Evidence-based medicine. Seattle, WA: Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 1994.
16. 16. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: The MEDLINE database, 1997. BMJ 315:180-3.
17. 17. Cooke IE, Sackett DL. Evidence-based obstetrics and gynaecology. Bailliere's Clini Obstet Gynaecol 1996;10(4).
18. 18. Enkin M, Murray, Keirse MJ, Chalmers I. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, second edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
19. 19. Dickersen K, Sherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic review. BMJ 1994;309:1286-91.
20. 20. Hayes RB, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Sinclair JC. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sounds studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Informatics Association 1994;1:447-58.
21. 21. Oxman A, Guyatt GH. The science of reviewing research. Annals of NY Academy Science 1993;703:125-34.