Adaptive finite element methods for compressible flow

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 190, Issue 8-10, 2000, Pages 1137-1162

  Burman, Erik ^a,b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ERROR ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LINEARIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEM STABILITY;

ADAPTIVE STREAMLINE DIFFUSION FINITE ELEMENT METHODS;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MODELING ERROR;

EID: 0034310567     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00470-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. S.C. Brenner, L.R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, Springer, Berlin, 1994.
2. E. Burman, Compressible finite element methods for compressible two-phase flow, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mathematics, Chalmers University of Technology, 1998.
3. S.F. Davis, A rotationally biased upwind difference scheme for the Euler equations, J. Comput. Phys. 56 (1984) 65-92.
4. K. Eriksson, C. Johnson, Adaptive streamline diffusion finite element methods for stationary convection-diffusion problems, Math. Comput. 60 (1993) 167-188.
5. F. Dubois, P.G. LeFloch, Boundary conditions for non-linear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, J. Differential Equations 71 (1988) 93-122.
6. P. Hansbo, Explicit streamline diffusion finite element methods for the compressible Euler equations in conservation variables, J. Comput. Phys. 109 (1993) 274-288.
7. A. Harten, On the symmetric form of conservation laws with entropy, J. Comput. Phys. 49 (1983) 151-164.
8. G. Hauke, T.J.R. Hughes, A comparative study of different sets of variables for solving compressible and incompressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Engrg. 153 (1998) 1-44.
9. C. Johnson, A. Szepessy, Adaptive finite element methods for conservation laws based on a posteriori error estimates, Commun. Pure. Appl. Math. 48 (1995) 199-234.
10. C. Johnson, A. Szepessy, P. Hansbo, On the convergence of shock-capturing streamline diffusion finite element methods for hyperbolic conservation laws, Math. Comput. 54 (1990) 107-129.
11. M.G. Larson, Adaptive finite element methods for the Euler equations in one-dimension, Department of Mathematics, Chalmers University of Technology, 1995 (Preprint 1995:01).
12. M. Mock, Systems of conservation laws of mixed type, J. Differential Equations 37 (1980) 70-88.
13. R. Sandboge, Quantitative error control for compressible flow, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 (5) (1998) 2014-2034.
14. G.A. Sod, A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of non-linear hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 27 (1978) 1-31.
15. J.R. Stewart, T.J.R. Hughes, Explicit residual-based a posteriori error estimation for the finite element discretizations of the Helmholtz equation: computation of the constant and new measure of error estimator quality, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 131 (1996) 335-363.
16. P. Woodward, P. Colella, The numerical solution of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys. 54 (1984) 115-173.