Bingo!: Hints of deviance in the accounts of sociability and profit of bingo players

Deviant Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 489-517

  Chapple, Constance ^a   Nofziger, Stacey ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034310319     PISSN: 01639625     EISSN: 15210456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01639620050184645     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arneklev, B. J., H. G. Grasmick, C. R. Tittle and R. J. Bursik Jr. 1993. “Low Self-Control and Imprudent Behavior.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9(3):225–247.
2. Becker, H. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. The Free Press.
3. Bingo Bugle. 1996. “Where Your Bingo Money Goes.” Bingo Bugle 10(11):2.
4. Browne, B. R. 1989. “Going for Tilt: Frequent Poker Players and Control.” Journal of Gambling Behavior 5(1):3–21.
5. Burnham, J. C. 1993. Bad Habits: Drinking, Smoking, Taking Drugs, Gambling, Sexual Misbehavior, and Swearing in American History. New York: New York University Press.
6. Charmaz, K. 1995. “Grounded Theory.” Pp. 27–49 in Rethinking Methods in Psychology, edited by Jonathan A. Smith, Rom Harr´e, and Luck Van Lingenhore. London: Sage.
7. Dixey, R. 1987. “It’s a Great Feeling When You Win: Women and Bingo.” Leisure Studies 6:199–214.
8. Dixey, R. and M. Talbot. 1984. “Women Leisure and Bingo.” Leisure Studies 3(2):243–244.
9. Frey, J. H. 1984. “Gambling: A Sociological Review.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 474:107–121.
10. Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss. 1965. “Temporal Aspects of Dyina as a Non-Scheduled Status Passage.” American Journal of Sociology 71(1):48–59.
11. Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
12. Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Anchor Books. New York, NY.
13. Gottfredson, M. and T. Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Hirschi, T. and M. Gottfredson. 1994. The Generality of Deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
15. King, K. M. 1985. “Gambling: Three Forms and Three Explanations.” Sociological Focus 18:235–248.
16. King, K. M. 1987. “Normative Contingencies: Charity and Moderation.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 8:215–237.
17. Keen, M. F. 1996. “Teaching Qualitative Methods: a face to face encounter.” Teaching Sociology 24(2):166–176.
18. King, K. M. 1990. “Neutralizing Marginally Deviant Behavior: Bingo Players and Superstition.” Journal of Gambling Studies 6(1): 43–61.
19. Kusyszyn, I. 1984. “The Psychology of Gambling.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
20. Lesieur, H. R. and R. L. Custer. 1984. “Pathological Gambling: Roots, Phases and Treatment.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 474:146–167.
21. Lo and, J., and L. H. Loand. 1995. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Belmont, CA.
22. McCaghy, C. H. 1989. Deviant Behavior: Crime Conict and Interest Groups. Macmillan Publishing Co. New York, NY.
23. Raf E. S. 1996. “U.S. Gross Annual Wager Report: Bingo Numbers in for 1995.” Bingo Bugle 10(11):24.
24. Rojek, C. 1989. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–11 in Leisure for Leisure, edited by Chris Rojek. London: The Macmillan Press LTD.
25. Smith, G. J., R. A. Volberg, and H. J. Wynne. 1994. “Leisure Behavior on the Edge: Differences between Controlled and Uncontrolled Gambling Practices.” Society and Leisure 17:233–246.
26. Smith, J. F. and V. I. Abt. 1984. “Gambling as Play.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 474:122–132.
27. Smith, R. W. and F. W. Preston 1984. “Vocabularies of Motives for Gambling Behavior.” Sociological Perspectives 27:325–348.
28. Stokowski, P. A. 1994. Leisure in Society: A Network Structural Perspective. London: Mansell Publishing.
29. Sykes, G. and D. Matza. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: a Theory of Delinquency.” American Journal of Sociology 22:664–670.