The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns at 2 kHz: I. Normal-hearing listeners

Hearing Research

Volumn 148, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 63-73

  Alcántara, José I ^a   Moore, Brian C J ^a   Vickers, Deborah A ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beat; Combination tone; Masking pattern

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FILTER; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; FILTRATION; HEARING; HUMANS; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REFERENCE VALUES; SOUND;

EID: 0034307772     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00114-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dau T., Kollmeier B., Kohlrausch A. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation: I. Detection and masking with narrowband carriers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;2892-2905.
2. Derleth, R.P., Dau, T., Kollmeier, B., 1999. Modelling masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrowband noise maskers. In: Dau, T., Hohmann, V. and Kollmeier, B. (Eds.), Psychophysics, Physiology and Models of Hearing, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 622-630.
3. Egan J.P., Hake H.W. On the masking pattern of a simple auditory stimulus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22:1950;622-630.
4. Ehmer R.H. Masking by tones vs noise bands. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31:1959;1253-1256.
5. Ehmer R.H. Masking patterns of tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31:1959;1115-1120.
6. Fassel, R., Kohlrausch, A., Dau, T., 2000. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (in press).
7. Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear. Res. 47:1990;103-138.
8. Goldstein J.L. Auditory spectral filtering and monaural phase perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41:1967;458-479.
9. Greenwood D.D. Aural combination tones and auditory masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 50:1971;502-543.
10. Hall J.L. Asymmetry of masking revisited: Generalization of masker and probe bandwidth. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;1023-1033.
11. Hellman R.P. Asymmetry of masking between noise and tone. Percept. Psychophys. 11:1972;241-246.
12. Hicks M.L., Bacon S.P. Some factors influencing comodulation masking release and across-channel masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;2504-2514.
13. Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I., Dau T. Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrowband noise maskers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1998;1023-1038.
14. Riesz R.R. Differential intensity sensitivity of the ear for pure tones. Phys. Rev. 31:1928;867-875.
15. Smoorenburg G.F. Audibility region of combination tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52:1972;603-614.
16. Wegel R.L., Lane C.E. The auditory masking of one sound by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Phys. Rev. 23:1924;266-285.
17. Yost W.A., Sheft S. Detecting amplitude modulation of sinusoidal carriers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1988;S35.
18. Yost W.A., Sheft S., Opie J. Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:1989;2138-2147.
19. 2)-cancellation tone on frequency range, frequency difference, level of primaries, and subject. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70:1981;1277-1288.
20. Zwicker E., Fastl H. Cubic difference sounds measured by threshold and compensation methods. Acustica. 29:1973;336-343.
21. Zwicker, E., Fastl, H., 1990. Psychoacoustics - Facts and Models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.