Paratuberculosis recognized as a problem at last: A review

Veterinary Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 200-204

  Bakker, D ^a   Willemsen, P T J ^a   van Zijderveld, F G ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; CATTLE; CROHN DISEASE; EUROPE; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; VACCINATION; VIROLOGY;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CROHN DISEASE; EUROPE; HUMANS; MYCOBACTERIUM PARATUBERCULOSIS; PARATUBERCULOSIS; PREVALENCE; VACCINATION;

EID: 0034304463     PISSN: 01652176     EISSN: 18755941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2000.9695058     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Argente G. Efficiency of vaccination and other control measures cstimated by fecal culturing in a regional program. In: Proceedings of the Third Collloquium on Paratuberculosis. Eds Chiodini RJ, and Kreeger JM. 1991:495–8.
2. Beard PM, Lendcrson D, Daniels M, Pirie A, Buxton D, Lutchings MR, McKcndrick I, Rhind S, Stevenson K, and Sharp M. Evidence for paratuberculosis in fox (Vulpes vulpes) and stoat (Mustela erminca). Vet Rcc 1999;145:612–3.
3. Benedictus G. Dijkhuizcn AA, and Stelwagen J. Economic losses due to paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 1987; 121 (7): 142–6.
4. Benedictus G. Evaluation of organised control of bovine paratuberculosis in Friesland province. Tijdschr Dicrgcnccskd 1984; 109:905–16.
5. Boclacrt F, Walravens K, Vennecrsch JP, Raskin A. Dufey J, and Godfroid J. Sample survey for estimating the herd and individual animal seroprevalence for bovine paratuberculosis in Belgium, (submitted Vet Microbiol)
6. Chiodini RJ. Historical overview and curTent approaches in determining a mycobacterial etiology of Crohn’s disease. In; Is Cohn’s disease a mycobacterial disease? Eds Mulder CJJ and Tytgat GNJ Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1992:1–15.
7. Chiodini RJ. Immunology: resistance to paratuberculosis. Vet Clin Of North Am (Food Animal Practice) 1996; 12(2): 313–43.
8. Chiodini RJ, Kruiningen HJ van, and Mcrkal RS. Ruminant paratubcrculosis (Johne’s disease): the current slants and future prospects. Cornell Vet 1984; 74:218–62.
9. Chiodini RJ, Kruiningen HJV, Merkal RS, Thayer WR, and Coutu JA. Characteristics of an unclassified Mycobacterium species isolated from patients with Crohn’s disease. J Gen Microbiol 1984; 20:966–71.
10. Crohn BB, Ginzburg 1, and Oppenheimer GD. Regional ileitis: a pathologic and clinical entity. J Am Med Assoc 1932;99:1323–8.
11. Dalziel TK. Chronic intestinal enteritis. British Med J 1913: 2:1068–1070.
12. European Commission Directorate-General Health and Consumer Protection. 2000; Possible links between Crohn’s disease and paratuberculosis. Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare.
13. Doyle TM. Vaccination against Johnc’s disease. Brit Vet J 1960; 116: 294–301.
14. Dijkhuizcn AA, Schaik G van, lluime RBM, Kalis CHJ, and Benedictus G. A cost benefit analysis of vaccination against paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. The Kenya Veterinarian 1994; 18:219–21.
15. Garcia Marin JF, Tellechea J. Gutierrez M, Corpa JM, and Perez V. Evaluation of two vaccines (killed and attenuated) against small ruminants paratuberculosis. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis. Eds Manning EJB, and Collins MT. 2000:234–41.
16. Green EP, Tizard MLY, Moss MT, Thompson J, Wintcrboume DJ, McFaddcn JJ, and Hermon-Taylor J. Sequence and characteristics of IS900 an insertion clement identified in a human Crohn’s disease isolate of Mycobacterium paratulwrculasis. Nucleic Acids Research 1989; 17 9063–73.
17. Grcig A, Stevenson K. Pérez V, Pirie AA, Grant JM, and Sharp JM. Paratuberculosis in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Vet Rcc 1997- 140: 141–3.
18. Haagsma J, Mulder CJJ, Eger A, and Tytgat GNJ. In: Is Crohn’s disease a mycobacterial disease? 1992; Pp 16-21. Eds Mulder CJJ, and Tytgat GNJ. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Herbert CN, Doyle TM, and Paterson AB. Tuberculin sensitivity in attested cattle vaccinated against Johne’s disease. Vet Rec 1959; 71:108–11.
20. Ingliss JSS, and Weipcrs M. The effect of Johnc’s vaccination on the efficiency of the single intradcrmal comparative tuberculin test. Brit Vet J 1963;119:426–9.
21. Johne HA, and Frothingam L. Ein cigcnthümlichcr Fall von Tubereulosc bcimRind. Dcutsch Zcitschr Ticrmcd Vcrgl Path 1895;21:438–54.
22. Jorgensen JB. On the occurrence of Mycobacterium johnei in the mesenteric lymphnodes of abattoir cattle. Nord Vet Med 1965; 17:97–102.
23. Jorgensen J B. Studies on the occurrence ofparaniberculosis in Denmark. Nord Vet Med 1972; 24:297–308.
24. Jorgensen JB. Survival of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in slurry. Nord Vet Med 1977; 29 (6): 267–70.
25. Juste RA, Garrido J, and Aduriz G. La paralubervuiosis desde Neiker IV reunion sobre paratuberculosis en España. Derio Spain October 26-27 1999.
26. Juste RA. Ill reunion sobre paratuberculosis en España. Informes Technicos34DptoDe Agricultura Y Pesca Gobierno Vasco 1990.
27. Kalis CHJ. Barkema IIW, and Hesselink JW. Herd certification for para-tuberculosis in unsuspected dairy herds using cultures of strategically pooled faecal samples. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis. Eds Manning EJB and Collins MT. 2000:55–8.
28. Kormcndy B. The effect of vaccination on the prevalence in large dairy herds. Vet Microbiol 1994; 41:117–25.
29. Milner AR, Mack WN. Coates KJ. Hill J, Gill L, and Shcldrick P.The sensitivity and specif icty of a modified ELISA for the diagnosis of Johnc’s disease from a field trial in cattle. Vet Microbiol 1990; 25; 193–8.
30. Muskens J. Barkema HW, Russchen E, van Maanen K, Schukken YH, and Bakkcr D. Prevalence and regional distribution of bovine paratuber-culosis in dairy herds in the Netherlands, (submitted Vet Microbiol).
31. Nielsen SS, Thamsborg SM. Houe H, and Bitch V. Bulk-tank milk ELISA antibodies for estimating the prevalence of paratubcrculosis in Danish dairy herds. Prev Vet Med 2000; 44:1–7.
32. Olt SL, Wells SJ, and Wagner BA. Herd level economic losses associated with Johnc’s disease on US dairy operations. Prev Vet Med 1999; 40; 179–92.
33. Stabel J. Production of gamma-intcrferon by peripheral blood mononuclear cells: an important diagnostic tool for the detection of subclinical paratubcrculosis. J Vet Diagn Invest 1996; 8:345–50.
34. Spangler E, Hcider LE, Bech-Niclsen S, and Dom CR. Serologic ELISA responses of calves vaccinated with a killed M.paratuberculosis vaccine. Am J Vet Res 1991; 52:1197–1200.
35. Stuart P, Vaccination against Johnc’s disease in cattle exposed to experimental infection. Brit Vet J 1965; 121:289–318.
36. Sweeney RW. Transmission of paratubcrculosis. Vet Clin Of North Am (Food Animal Practice) 1996; 12 (2): 305–12.
37. Thompson DE. The role of mycobacteria in Crohn’s disease. L Med Microbiol 1994;41:74–94.
38. Twort FW, and Ingram GLY. A method for isolating and cultivating the Mycobacterium enteritides chronicae pseudotubcrcidosae bovis Johne and some experiments on the preparation of a diagnostic vaccine for pseudotuberculous enteritis of bovines. Vet J 1912:68:353–65.
39. Vallec H. and Rinjard P. Etudes sur l’cntcritc paratubcrculcusc dcs bovides (note preliminairc). Rev Gen Med Vet 1926; 35:1–9.
40. Van Weering HJ, Breukink H, Giessen J van der, Haagsma J, Kalis CHJ, Lange D de, Snoep JJ, Vries G de, and Wentink GH. Intermediate report on the vaccination of Johne’s disease in the Netherlands. The Paratubcrculosis Newsletter 1995; 7:4–8.
41. Viske D. Larsson B, Engvall A, and Bolske G. Paratubcrculosis in Sweden. Epidemiologie et Sante Aniinale 1997; 31:31–2.
42. Wentink GH, Bongcrs JH, Zccuwcn AAPA, and Jaartsvcld FHJ. Incidence of paratuberculosis after vaccination against Mparatuher-culosis in two infected dairy herds. J Vet MedB 1994; 41:517–22.
43. Whipple DL, Callihan DR, and Jamigan JL. Cultivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal specimens and a suggested standardized procedure. J Vet Diagn Invest 1991; 3 (4): 368–74.
44. Whitlock RH. Wells SJ. Sweeney LRW, and Ticm J van. ELISA and fecal culture: sensitivity and specificity for each method In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis. Eds Manning EJB and Collins MT. 2000:353–62.
45. Whitlock RII. and Buergclt C. Prcclinical and clinical manifestations of paratuberculosis. Vet Clin Of North Am (Food Animal Practice) 1996; 12 (2): 345–56.
46. Willcmscn PTJ, Bakker D, Damman M. Eger A, and van Zijderveld FG. An error in the reported IS900 nucleotide sequence affects the proposed expression of ORF2 (Hed) and the detection of M.a.paratuberculosis using the polymerase chain reaction. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis. Eds Manning EJB and Collins MT. 2000:466–71.
47. Yokomizo Y, Kishima M, Mori Y, and Nishimori K. Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in comparison with complement fixation test for the diagnosis of subclinical paratuberculosis in cattle. J Vet MedSci 1991; 53 (4): 577–84.