Video rate confocal microscopic imaging of dentin/adhesive interfacial failure under load

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 271-279

  Griffiths, Brigitte M ^b   Watson, Timothy F ^a   Pagliari, Daniel E ^a   Pilecki, Peter ^a   Sherriff, Martyn ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL LINER BOND 2; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; EBS ADHESIVE SYSTEM; FLUORESCENT DYE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OPTIBOND; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE PLUS; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE PLUS;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTIN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VIDEORECORDING; WEIGHT BEARING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVENESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FLUORESCENT DYES; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MOLAR, THIRD; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0034303882     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Øilo G. Bond strength testing -What does it mean? Int Dent J 1993;43:492-498.
2. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-125.
3. Söderholm KJM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: A report of the ASC MD156 task group on test methods for the adhesion of restorative materials. Dent Mater 1991;7:74-83.
4. Kinloch AJ. Review. The science of adhesion. Part 2 Mechanics and mechanisms of failure. J Mater Sci 1982;17:617-651.
5. Ruggeberg FA. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure. Review of the literature. Report of ASC MD 156 task group. Dent Mater 1991;7:2-10.
6. Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentin bonding systems. J Dent 1994; 22:73-81.
7. Guidance of testing adhesion to tooth structure. ISO TR 11405. 1991.
8. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength -Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994; 10:236-240.
9. Kelly JR. Perspective on strength. Dent Mater 1995;1:103-110.
10. van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989;17:61-67.
11. DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995;11:126-131.
12. van Noort R Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991;70:889-892.
13. Versluis A. Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997; 76:1298-1307.
14. Strang R, Whitters CJ, Brown D, Clarke RL, Curtis RV, Hatton PV et al. Dental materials: 1996 Literature review. J Dent 1998; 26:191-207.
15. Griffiths BM, Watson TF. Resin-dentin interface of Scotch Bond MultiPurpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1995; 8:212-216.
16. Griffiths BM, Watson TF, Sherriff M. The influences of dentin bonding systems and their handling characteristics on the morphology and micropermeability of dentin adhesive interfaces. J Dent 1999;27:63-71.
17. Watson TF. Applications of high speed confocal imaging techniques in operative dentistry. Scanning 1994;16:168-173.
18. Aubrey DW and Sherriff M. Peel adhesion and viscoelasticity of rubber resin blends. J Polymer Science 1980;18:2597-2608.