Canonical correlation and chi-square: Relationships and interpretation

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 127, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 341-353

  Dunlap, William P ^a   Brody, Charles J ^b   Greer, Tammy ^c  

^a Tulane University   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Canonical correlation; Chi square; Contingency table analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; EYE COLOR; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; SOCIOECONOMICS;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; EYE COLOR; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 0034303052     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221300009598588     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bartlett, M. S. (1941). The statistical significance of canonical correlations. Biometrika, 32, 29-38.
2. Bradley, J. V. (1968). Distribution-free statistical tests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Fisher, R. A. (1940). The precision of discriminant functions. Annals of Eugenics, 10, 422-429.
4. Gilula, Z., & Haberman, S. J. (1986). Canonical analysis of contingency tables by maximum likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 780-788.
5. Goodman, L. A. (1985). The analysis of cross-correlated data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with and without missing entries. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 13, 10-69.
6. Goodman, L. A. (1987). New methods for analyzing the intrinsic character of qualitative variables using cross-classified data. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 529-583.
7. Greenacre, M. (1994). Correspondence analysis and its interpretation. In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social sciences: Recent developments and applications (pp. 3-22). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (1994). Correspondence analysis in the social sciences: Recent developments and applications. San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Guttman, L. (1941). The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and a method of scale construction. In P. Horst (Ed.), The prediction of personal adjustment (pp. 319-348). New York: Social Science Research Council.
10. Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. Hirshfeld, H. O. (1935). A connection between correlation and contingency. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31, 520-524.
12. Maung, K. (1941). Measurement of association in a contingency table with special reference to the pigmentation of hair and eye colours of Scottish school children. Annals of Eugenics, 11, 189-223.
13. McNemar, Q. (1962). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
14. Srole, L., Langner, T. S., Michael, S. T., Opler, M. K., & Rennie, T. A. C. (1962). Mental health in the metropolis: The midtown Manhattan study. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
16. Tocher, J. F. (1908). Pigmentation survey of school children in Scotland. Biometrika, 6, 129-235.