The relationship between cognitive ability and positive and negative priming in identity and spatial priming tasks

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 127, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 372-382

  Koshino, Hideya ^a   Boese, Glenna A ^a   Ferraro, F Richard ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Identity priming; Individual differences; Negative priming; Spatial ability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; SEX FACTORS; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034302977     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221300009598591     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and post-categorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 107-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Connelly, S. L., & Hasher, L. (1993). Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1238-1250.
3. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.
4. Dempster, F. N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45-75.
5. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors on visual selection. Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145-173.
6. Halpem, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091-1102.
7. Hartley, A. (1993). Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age. Psychology and Aging, 8, 371-379.
8. Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E. R., Zacks, R. T., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 163-169.
9. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1990). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (3rd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.
10. Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491-512.
11. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neurological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. McDowed, J. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 6, 265-273.
13. Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seifert, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A réévaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
14. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
15. Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 565-576.
16. Neumann, E., & DeSchepper, B. G. (1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and dis-tractor inhibition in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1136-1145.
17. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 613-623.
18. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 206-217.
19. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
20. Tipper, S. P., MacQueen, G. M., & Brehaut, J. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention. Perception dc Psychophysics, 43, 45-52.
21. Tipper, S. P., & Milliken, B. (1996). Distinguishing between inhibition-based and episodic retrieval-based accounts of negative priming. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 337-363). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioral goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
23. Ungerleider, L., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. Ingle, M. Goodale, & R. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
25. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.
26. Wechsler, D. (1981). The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
27. West, R. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272-292.