Measurement of endodontic file lengths: A density profile plot analysis

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 615-618

  Weller, R Norman ^a,b   Potter, Brad J ^a   Loushine, Robert J ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; RADIOGRAPHY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CADAVER; CALIBRATION; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH APEX; TOOTH ROOT; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0034302115     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200010000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. West JD, Roane JB, Goerig AC. Cleaning and shaping the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Bums RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1994:200-2.
2. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, van der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital intraoral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997;25:215-24.
3. Griffiths BM, Brown JE, Hyatt AT, Linney AD. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length. Int Endod J 1992;25:279-87.
4. Rushton VE, Shearer AC, Horner K, Czajka J. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation. Int Endod J 1995;28:149-53.