Coherently controlled nanoscale molecular deposition

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 15, 2000, Pages 3125-3128

  Dey, Bijoy K ^a   Shapiro, Moshe ^a,b   Brumer, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; LASERS; MOLECULAR BEAMS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR VIBRATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; POTENTIAL ENERGY; QUANTUM THEORY; SURFACES;

COLLIMATED NEUTRAL MOLECULAR BEAM; NANOSCALE MOLECULAR DEPOSITION; OPTICAL STANDING WAVE; QUANTUM INTERFERENCE EFFECTS;

MOLECULAR PHYSICS;

EID: 0034301177     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3125     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. P. Gordon and A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606 (1980); P. E. Moskowitz, P. L. Gould, and D. E. Pritchard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1784 (1985); J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 992 (1985); A. P. Kazantsev, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 784 (1974); C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Today 43, 33 (1990); M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992); C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1659 (1987).
2. J. P. Gordon and A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606 (1980); P. E. Moskowitz, P. L. Gould, and D. E. Pritchard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1784 (1985); J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 992 (1985); A. P. Kazantsev, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 784 (1974); C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Today 43, 33 (1990); M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992); C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1659 (1987).
3. J. P. Gordon and A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606 (1980); P. E. Moskowitz, P. L. Gould, and D. E. Pritchard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1784 (1985); J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 992 (1985); A. P. Kazantsev, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 784 (1974); C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Today 43, 33 (1990); M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992); C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1659 (1987).
4. J. P. Gordon and A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606 (1980); P. E. Moskowitz, P. L. Gould, and D. E. Pritchard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1784 (1985); J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 992 (1985); A. P. Kazantsev, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 784 (1974); C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Today 43, 33 (1990); M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992); C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1659 (1987).
5. J. P. Gordon and A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606 (1980); P. E. Moskowitz, P. L. Gould, and D. E. Pritchard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1784 (1985); J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 992 (1985); A. P. Kazantsev, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 784 (1974); C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Today 43, 33 (1990); M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992); C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1659 (1987).
6. J. P. Gordon and A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606 (1980); P. E. Moskowitz, P. L. Gould, and D. E. Pritchard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1784 (1985); J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 992 (1985); A. P. Kazantsev, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 784 (1974); C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Today 43, 33 (1990); M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992); C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1659 (1987).
7. J. P. Gordon and A. Ashkin, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1606 (1980); P. E. Moskowitz, P. L. Gould, and D. E. Pritchard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1784 (1985); J. Prodan, A. Migdall, W. D. Phillips, I. So, H. Metcalf, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 992 (1985); A. P. Kazantsev, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 784 (1974); C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji and W. D. Phillips, Phys. Today 43, 33 (1990); M. Kasevich and S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992); C. Salomon, J. Dalibard, A. Aspect, H. Metcalf, and C. N. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1659 (1987).
8. G. Timp, R. E. Behringer, D. M. Tennant, J. E. Cunningham, M. Prentiss, and K. K. Berggren, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1636 (1992).
9. K. Berggren, M. Prentiss, G. L. Timp, and R. E. Behringer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11, 1166 (1994).
10. H. Stapelfeldt, H. Sakai, E. Constant, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2787 (1997); H. Sakai, A. Tarasevitch, J. Danilov, H. Stapelfeldt, R. W. Yip, C. Ellert, E. Constant, and PB. Corkum, Phys. Rev A 57, 2794 (1998).
11. H. Stapelfeldt, H. Sakai, E. Constant, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2787 (1997); H. Sakai, A. Tarasevitch, J. Danilov, H. Stapelfeldt, R. W. Yip, C. Ellert, E. Constant, and PB. Corkum, Phys. Rev A 57, 2794 (1998).
12. T. Seideman, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 2881 (1997); Phys. Rev. A 56, R17 (1997).
13. T. Seideman, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 2881 (1997); Phys. Rev. A 56, R17 (1997).
14. M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 287 (2000).
15. E. McCullough, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, Phys. Rev. A 61, 041801 (2000).
16. A. Vardi, D. G. Abrashkevich, E. Frishman, and M. Shapiro, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 6166 (1997); A. Vardi, M. Shapiro, and K. Bergmann, Opt. Express 4, 91 (1999).
17. A. Vardi, D. G. Abrashkevich, E. Frishman, and M. Shapiro, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 6166 (1997); A. Vardi, M. Shapiro, and K. Bergmann, Opt. Express 4, 91 (1999).
18. For simplicity in the computation, we do not include a free flight time from the nozzle to the onset of the field in the computation. Including this time would increase both the number of molecules lost from the target area due to the transverse velocity spread as well as the width of the individual peaks.
19. D. N. Sutherland, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 25, 373 (1967); Nature (London) 226, 1241 (1974).
20. D. N. Sutherland, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 25, 373 (1967); Nature (London) 226, 1241 (1974).
21. Thus, for example, molecules may well arrive at the surface with some degree of alignment, since molecules with different M are subject to different forces.