ATR performance modeling and estimation

Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 269-285

  Dudgeon, Dan E ^a  

^a MIT LINCOLN LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESTIMATION; EXTRAPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SENSORS; SURVEILLANCE RADAR; SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR;

AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION (ATR);

RADAR TARGET RECOGNITION;

EID: 0034299642     PISSN: 10512004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/dspr.2000.0375     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Dudgeon, D. E, ATR performance modeling and estimation, Lincoln Laboratory Technical Report 1051, ESC-TR-97-137, December 7, 1998.
2. Van Trees H. L. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory (Part 1). 1968;Wiley, New York.
3. Devroye L., Gyorfi L., Lugosi G. A Probabilistic Theory of Recognition. 1996;Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. 1988;Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
5. Fukunaga K. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. 1972;Academic Press, New York.
6. Fukunaga K. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. 1990;Academic Press, New York.
7. Fukunaga K., Krile T. F. Calculation of Bayes' recognition error for two multivariate Gaussian distributions. IEEE Trans. Comput. 18:1969;220-229.
8. Lainiotis D. G., Park S. K. Probability of error bounds. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics. 1:April 1971;175-178.
9. Garber F. D., Djouadi A. Bounds on the Bayes classification error based on pairwise risk functions. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intelligence. 10:1988;281-288.
10. Williams A. C., Clark B. Evaluation of SAR ATR. SPIE Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition V. April 1996;. p. 36-45.
11. Novak L. On the sensitivity of Bayes and Fisher classifiers in radar target detection. IEEE Proc. 18 th Asilomar Conference on Circuits, Systems and Computers. November 5-7, 1984;. p. 367-372.
12. Williams A. A comparative study of the Gaussian form of the Bhattacharyya metric for ATR performance evaluation. SPIE Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar IV. April 1997;. p. 258-266.
13. Irving, W. W, and, Washburn, R. B, Performance estimation theory, WL-TR-97-1021, Alphatech, Inc, interim report for period 06/01/95-12/01/96, submitted to Wright Laboratory/AACA, September 1996.
14. Lincoln Lab. J. 6:1993.
15. Irving, W. W, Washburn, R. B, and, Grimson, W. E. L, Bounding ROC performance of peak-based target detectors, Report TM-489, Alphatech, Inc, interim report for period 06/01/95-12/01/96, submitted to Wright Laboratory/AACA, November 1996.
16. Horowitz L. L., Brendel G. F. Fundamental SAR ATR performance predictions for design tradeoffs. SPIE Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar IV. April 1997.
17. DeGraaf S. R. SAR image enhancement via adaptive polarization synthesis and polarimetric detection performance. Proc. Polarimetric Technology Workshop. August 16-18, 1988;Army Missile Command, Alabama.
18. Yeang C.-P., Shapiro J. H. Target detection theory for stripmap SAR using physics-based multiresolution signatures. SPIE Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar V. April 1998;. p. 646-660.
19. Grenander U., Srivastava A. Performance Analysis of Bayesian Object Recognition. 1997;Brown UniversityDivision of Applied Mathematics, Providence.
20. Miller M. I., Grenander U., O'Sullivan J. A., Snyder D. L. Automatic target recognition organized via jump-diffusion algorithms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6:1997;157-174.
21. Keydel, E. R, Stanhope, S, Williams, W, Rajlich, V, and, Sieron, R, Modeling image and feature uncertainties in model-based SAR prediction, ERIM International, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI, preprint.
22. Doria, D. M, Webster, D. W, and, Leonard, J. D, Results of adaptive FLIR ATR tests, preprint, October 1997.
23. Baggenstoss, P. M, Heuristic classifier performance bounds in high dimensional settings, preprint, July 8, 1997.
24. Scott D. W. Multivariate Density Estimation. 1992;Wiley, New York.
25. Briles S. D. Information-theoretic performance bounding of Bayesian identifiers. SPIE Automatic Object Recognition III. 1960:1993;255-266.
26. Cover T. M., Thomas J. A. Elements of Information Theory. 1991;Wiley, New York.
27. Garber F., Zelnio E. On some simple estimates of ATR performance, and initial comparisons for a small data set. SPIE Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar IV. April 1997;. p. 150-161.
28. Viola, P. A, Alignment by maximization of mutual information, A.I. Technical Report 1548, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, June 1995.
29. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6:1997.