Stochastic spatiotemporal intermittency and noise-induced transition to an absorbing phase

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 17, 2000, Pages 3612-3615

  Zimmermann, Martin G ^a   Toral, Raúl ^a   Piro, Oreste ^a   San Miguel, Maxi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; RANDOM PROCESSES; WHITE NOISE;

MEAN FIELD APPROXIMATION; NOISE INDUCED TRANSITION; STOCHASTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; STOCHASTIC SPATIOTEMPORAL INTERMITTENCY;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 0034297813     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3612     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. P. C. Hohenberg and D. Shraiman, Physica (Amsterdam) 37D, 109 (1989).
2. M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Science 263, 1569 (1994).
3. T. Bohr, M. H. Jensen, G. Pladin, and A. Vulpiani, Dynamical Systems Approach to Turbulence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
4. G. Ahlers, Physica (Amsterdam) 249A, 18 (1998).
5. J. García-Ojalvo and J. M. Sancho, Noise in Spatially Extended Systems (Springer, New York, 1999).
6. C. Doering, Phys. Lett. A 122, 133 (1987).
7. R. Müller, K. Lippen, A. Kühnel, and U. Behn, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2658 (1997).
8. Y. Tu, G. Grinstein, and M. A. Muñoz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 274 (1997).
9. M. A. Muñoz, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1377-1383 (1998).
10. V. S. L'vov and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3543 (1992); P. Manneville and H. Chaté, Physica (Amsterdam) 96D, 30 (1996).
11. V. S. L'vov and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3543 (1992); P. Manneville and H. Chaté, Physica (Amsterdam) 96D, 30 (1996).
12. H. Chaté and P. Manneville, Physica (Amsterdam) 32D, 409-422 (1988); H. Chaté, Nonlinearity 7, 185-204 (1994).
13. H. Chaté and P. Manneville, Physica (Amsterdam) 32D, 409-422 (1988); H. Chaté, Nonlinearity 7, 185-204 (1994).
14. A. Amengual, E. Hernández-García, R. Montagne, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4379 (1997).
15. M. Argentina and P. Coullet, Phys. Rev. E 56, R2359 (1997); Physica (Amsterdam) 257A, 45 (1998).
16. M. Argentina and P. Coullet, Phys. Rev. E 56, R2359 (1997); Physica (Amsterdam) 257A, 45 (1998).
17. M. G. Zimmermann, S. O. Firle, M. A. Natiello, M. Hildebrand, M. Eiswirth, M. Bär, A. K. Bangia, and I. G. Kevrekidis, Physica (Amsterdam) 110D, 92-104 (1997).
18. J. Rolf, T. Bohr, and M. H. Jensen, Phys. Rev. E 57, R2503 (1998).
19. N. G. van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).
20. This SPDE is to be considered in the Itô interpretation such that the noise term does not alter either the location or the stability of the absorbing state at u = 0.
21. This choice makes our SPDE model in the multiplicative noise universality class [9].
22. t = √(1 ± √1 - 3ah)/3h.
23. W. Horsthemke and R. Lefever, Noise Induced Transitions (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984), Chap. 5.
24. Parameters are chosen such that nucleation events of the laminar phase occur on a much longer time scale than the one shown.
25. L. Schimansky-Geier and Ch. Zülicke, Z. Phys. B 82, 157 (1991).
26. C. Van den Broeck, J. M. R. Parrondo, J. Armero, and A. Hernández-Machado, Phys. Rev. E 49, 2639 (1994).
27. 1(u)/2 = 0. Our results, instead, do not follow from the effect of such a term.
28. 0 (the solid line in Fig. 4).
29. C. Van den Broeck, J. M. R. Parrondo, and R. Toral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3395 (1994); C. Van den Broeck, J. M. R. Parrondo, R. Toral, and R. Kawai, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4084-4094 (1997).
30. C. Van den Broeck, J. M. R. Parrondo, and R. Toral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3395 (1994); C. Van den Broeck, J. M. R. Parrondo, R. Toral, and R. Kawai, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4084-4094 (1997).