Engineering cavity-field states by projection synthesis

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 043810-043811

  Serra, R M ^a   De Almeida, N G ^a   Villas Boas C J ^a   Moussa, M H Y ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ATOMIC PHYSICS; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PHOTONS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

CAVITY FIELD STATE; QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS; RESONANT ATOM FIELD INTERACTION; WIGNER DISTRIBUTION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0034297650     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. B. E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 143 (1998).
2. T. Pellizzari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5242 (1997).
3. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).
4. S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4148 (1996).
5. B. Baseia, M. H. Y. Moussa, and V. S. Bagnato, Phys. Lett. A 231, 331 (1997).
6. D. T. Pegg, L. S. Phillips, and S. M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1604 (1998).
7. C. J. Villas-Bôas, N. G. Almeida, and M. H. Y. Moussa, Phys. Rev. A 60, 2759 (1999).
8. A. S. Parkins, P. Marte, P. Zoller, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3095 (1993); Phys. Rev. A 51, 1578 (1995); B. M. Garraway, B. Sherman, H. Moya-Cessa, P. L. Knight, and G. Kurizki, ibid. 49, 535 (1994); C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1055 (1996).
9. A. S. Parkins, P. Marte, P. Zoller, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3095 (1993); Phys. Rev. A 51, 1578 (1995); B. M. Garraway, B. Sherman, H. Moya-Cessa, P. L. Knight, and G. Kurizki, ibid. 49, 535 (1994); C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1055 (1996).
10. A. S. Parkins, P. Marte, P. Zoller, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3095 (1993); Phys. Rev. A 51, 1578 (1995); B. M. Garraway, B. Sherman, H. Moya-Cessa, P. L. Knight, and G. Kurizki, ibid. 49, 535 (1994); C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1055 (1996).
11. A. S. Parkins, P. Marte, P. Zoller, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3095 (1993); Phys. Rev. A 51, 1578 (1995); B. M. Garraway, B. Sherman, H. Moya-Cessa, P. L. Knight, and G. Kurizki, ibid. 49, 535 (1994); C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1055 (1996).
12. K. Vogel, V. M. Akulin, and W. P. Schleich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1816 (1993).
13. M. H. Y. Moussa and B. Baseia, Phys. Lett. A 238, 223 (1998).
14. M. Freyberger, Phys. Rev. A 51, 3347 (1995).
15. Usually, the fidelity of a given quantum process is defined in order to account for the inevitable errors introduced by the environment due to dissipative mechanism. Here, however, the fidelity is defined to account for the errors introduced uniquely due to the approximations inherent to the sculpture scheme.
16. X. Maître, E. Hagley, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, P. Goy, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 769 (1997).