Fluctuation and relaxation properties of pulled fronts: a scenario for nonstandard Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 17, 2000, Pages 3556-3559

  Tripathy, Goutam ^a   Van Saarloos, Wim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

CAHN-HILLIARD EQUATION; KARDAR-PARISI-ZHANG SCALING; LONG WAVELENGTH LOW FREQUENCY THEORY; PULLED FRONTS;

SOLID STATE PHYSICS;

EID: 0034293895     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3556     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).
2. J. Krug and H. Spohn, in Solids far from Equilibrium, edited by C. Godrèche (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1992).
3. T. J. Halpin-Healy and Y. C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995).
4. A.-L. Barabási and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
5. J. Krug, Adv. Phys. 46, 139 (1997).
6. See, e.g., A. Karma and W.-J. Rappel, Phys. Rev. E 57, 4323 (1998), and references therein.
7. U. Ebert and W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1650 (1998); Physica (Amsterdam) 146D, 1 (2000).
8. U. Ebert and W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1650 (1998); Physica (Amsterdam) 146D, 1 (2000).
9. U. Ebert and W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rep. 337, 139 (2000).
10. G. Tripathy, A. Rocco, J. Casademunt, and W. van Saarloos (unpublished).
11. J. Riordan, C. R. Doering, and D. ben-Avraham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 565 (1995).
12. E. Ben-Jacob, H. R. Brand, G. Dee, L. Kramer, and J. S. Langer, Physica (Amsterdam) 14D, 348 (1985).
13. In [10], the width is not defined relative to h̄; as a result, the long time data of [10] show the diffusive wandering of h̄, rather than the saturation of W.
14. G. Foltin, K. Oerding, Z. Rácz, R. L. Workman, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. E 50, R639 (1994); Z. Rácz and M. Plischke, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3530 (1994); Z. Rácz (unpublished).
15. G. Foltin, K. Oerding, Z. Rácz, R. L. Workman, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. E 50, R639 (1994); Z. Rácz and M. Plischke, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3530 (1994); Z. Rácz (unpublished).
16. G. Foltin, K. Oerding, Z. Rácz, R. L. Workman, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. E 50, R639 (1994); Z. Rácz and M. Plischke, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3530 (1994); Z. Rácz (unpublished).
17. A. Rocco, U. Ebert, and W. van Saarloos, Phys. Rev. E 62, R13 (2000).
18. E. Marinari, A. Pagnani, and G. Parisi, cond-mat/0005105.
19. This might be especially true for pulled fronts, since the speed of one-dimensional fronts depends strongly on a finite-particle type cutoff. See E. Brunet and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2597 (1997); D. A. Kessler, Z. Ner, and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. E 58, 107 (1998).
20. This might be especially true for pulled fronts, since the speed of one-dimensional fronts depends strongly on a finite-particle type cutoff. See E. Brunet and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2597 (1997); D. A. Kessler, Z. Ner, and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. E 58, 107 (1998).