A common perceptual space for harmonic and percussive timbres

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1426-1439

  Lakatos, Stephen ^a,b,c  

^a JOHN B PIERCE LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Inst Rech Coord Acoustique M   (France)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND DETECTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 0034293572     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212144     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BEAUCHAMP, J. W. (1993). Unix workstation software for analysis, graphics, modification and synthesis of musical sounds (Audio Engineering Society Preprint No. 3479). New York: Audio Engineering Society.
2. BEAUCHAMP, J. W., & HORNER, A. (1995). Wavetable interpolation synthesis based on time-variant spectral analysis of musical sounds (Audio Engineering Society Preprint No. 3960). New York: Audio Engineering Society.
3. CARROLL, J. D., & CHANG, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
4. CORTER, J. E., & TVERSKY, A. (1986). Extended similarity trees. Psychometrika, 51, 429-451.
5. ECKEL, G., & GONZALEZ-ARROYO, R. (1994). Musically salient control abstractions for sound synthesis. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 256-259). Aarhus: International Computer Music Association.
6. GIBSON, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
7. GREY, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1270-1277.
8. GREY, J. M., & GORDON, J. W. (1978). Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 1493-1500.
9. HOPE, A. C. (1968). A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 30, 582-598.
10. IVERSON, P., & KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1993). Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 2595-2603.
11. KRIMPHOFF, J., MCADAMS, S., & WINSBERG, S. (1994). Caracterisation du timbre des sons complexes: II. Analyses acoustiques et quantification psychophysique [Characterization of the timbre of complex sounds: II. Acoustic analyses and psychophysical quantifications]. Journal de Physique, 4, 625-628.
12. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1989). Why is musical timbre so hard to understand? In S. Nielzen & O. Olsson (Eds.), Structure and perception of electroacoustic sound and music (pp. 43-53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. LAKATOS, S., MCADAMS, S., & CAUSSÉ, R. (1997). The representation of auditory source characteristics: Simple geometric form. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1180-1190.
14. MCADAMS, S., WINSBERG, S., DONNADIEU, S., DE SOETE, G., & KRIMPHOFF, J. (1995). Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent participant classes. Psychological Research, 58, 177-192.
15. MILLER, J. R., & CARTERETTE, E. C. (1975). Perceptual space for musical structures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, 711-720.
16. OPOLKO, F., & WAPNICK, J. ( 1987). McGill University master samples [Compact disk]. Montreal: McGill University.
17. PITT, M. A. (1994). Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 976-986.
18. SATTATH, S., & TVERSKY, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42, 319-345.
19. SCHWARZ, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
20. SMITH, B. K. (1994). Psiexp, version 1.3: A psychacoustic experiment environment for the NeXT computer [Computer program]. Paris: IRCAM.
21. SMITH, J. O., & GOSSETT, P. (1984). A flexible sampling-rate conversion method. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Vol. 2., pp. 19.4.1-19.4.2). New York: IEEE Press.
22. TORGERSON, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
23. WEDIN, L., & GOUDE, G. (1972). Dimension analysis of the perception of instrument timbre. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 228-240.
24. WINSBERG, S., & CARROLL, J. D. (1989). A quasi-nonmetric method for multidimensional scaling via an extended Euclidean model. Psychometrika, 54, 217-229.
25. WINSBERG, S., & DE SOETE, G. (1993). A latent class approach to fitting the weighted Euclidean model, CLASCAL. Psychometrika, 58, 315-330.