Extraction of the D13(1520) photon-decay couplings from pion- and η-photoproduction data

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 482011-482013

  Workman, Ron ^a   Arndt, Richard A ^a   Strakovsky, Igor I ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034288488     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.62.048201     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. [1] B. Krusche, N.C. Mukhopadhyay, J.-F. Zhang, and M. Benmerrouche, Phys. Lett. B 397, 171 (1997); B. Krusche et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3736 (1995).
2. [1] B. Krusche, N.C. Mukhopadhyay, J.-F. Zhang, and M. Benmerrouche, Phys. Lett. B 397, 171 (1997); B. Krusche et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3736 (1995).
3. 1/2 are 0.060±0.015 (VPI) and 0.053±0.15 (Glasgow). Results from Ref. [1] are in the range 0.120±0.011 ±0.015.
4. [3] See, for example, S.A. Dytman, T.P. Vrana, and T.-S.H. Lee, πN Newsletter 14, 17 (1998).
5. [4] T. Feuster and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 59, 460 (1999).
6. [5] N.C. Mukhopadhyay and N. Mathur, Phys. Lett. B 444, 7 (1998).
7. [6] L. Tiator, D. Drechsel, G. Knöchlein, and C. Bennhold, Phys. Rev. C 60, 035210 (1999).
8. 1/2 are, respectively, 0.167±0.005 and -0.020±0.007 (VPI), 0.156±0.022 and -0.028±0.014 (Glasgow).
9. [8] Phenomenological values of the helicity 1/2 and 3/2 transition amplitudes have remained relatively stable in fits to pion-photoproduction data. Quark models, however, have predicted ratios ranging between the pion- and η-photoproduction results. See Ref. [5] for a discussion of the various quark model predictions.
10. [9] Particle Data Group, R.M. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. D 54, 1 (1996); Particle Data Group, C. Caso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).
11. [9] Particle Data Group, R.M. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. D 54, 1 (1996); Particle Data Group, C. Caso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).
12. 2- taken at the resonance position (no background separation), we find agreement at the 10-20% level. If an improper background-resonance separation should be the problem in this case, the uncertainties associated with all other states would be questionable as well.
13. [11] R.A. Arndt, R.L. Workman, Z. Li, and L.D. Roper, Phys. Rev. C 42, 1864 (1990); F.A. Berends and A. Donnachie, Nucl. Phys. B136, 317 (1978).
14. [11] R.A. Arndt, R.L. Workman, Z. Li, and L.D. Roper, Phys. Rev. C 42, 1864 (1990); F.A. Berends and A. Donnachie, Nucl. Phys. B136, 317 (1978).
15. [12] We used, as a starting point, the multipole solution generated by our group using the data available as of the Summer of 1999 (SM99). Similar results were obtained using a previous multipole analysis [13].
16. [13] R.A. Arndt, I.I. Strakovsky, and R.L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 53, 430 (1996).
17. 2- multipoles, as extracted from pion-photoproduction data, have very nearly equal phases which pass through 90° very near the resonance energy.
18. [15] B. Krusche, J. Ahrens, R. Beck, M. Fuchs, S.J. Hall, F. Härter, J.D. Kellie, V. Metag, M. Röbig-Landau, Eur. Phys. J. (to be published); B. Krusche and J. Ahrens (private communication).
19. [15] B. Krusche, J. Ahrens, R. Beck, M. Fuchs, S.J. Hall, F. Härter, J.D. Kellie, V. Metag, M. Röbig-Landau, Eur. Phys. J. (to be published); B. Krusche and J. Ahrens (private communication).
20. [16] E.D. Bloom, C.A. Heusch, C.Y. Prescott, and L.S. Rochester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 671 (1967); D.E. Lundquist, R.L. Anderson, J.V. Allaby, and D.M. Ritson, Phys. Rev. 168, 1527 (1968); A.S. Bratashevskij, V.G. Gorbenko, A.I. Derebchinskij, A.Ya. Derkach, Yu.V. Zhebrovskij, A.A. Zybalov, I.M. Karnaukhov, L.Ya. Kolesnikov, O.G. Konovalov, A.A. Lukhanin, A.S. Omelaenko, A.L. Rubashkin, P.V. Sorokin, E.A. Sporov, A.E. Tenishev, and S.G. Tonapetyan, Nucl. Phys. B166, 525 (1980); A.S. Bratashevskij, A.A. Zybalov, S.P. Karasev, O.G. Konovalov, E.E. Korobova, A.S. Omelaenko, P.V. Sorokin, Yu.O. Storozhenko, and A.E. Tenishev, Yad. Fiz. 42, 658 (1985)
21. [16] E.D. Bloom, C.A. Heusch, C.Y. Prescott, and L.S. Rochester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 671 (1967); D.E. Lundquist, R.L. Anderson, J.V. Allaby, and D.M. Ritson, Phys. Rev. 168, 1527 (1968); A.S. Bratashevskij, V.G. Gorbenko, A.I. Derebchinskij, A.Ya. Derkach, Yu.V. Zhebrovskij, A.A. Zybalov, I.M. Karnaukhov, L.Ya. Kolesnikov, O.G. Konovalov, A.A. Lukhanin, A.S. Omelaenko, A.L. Rubashkin, P.V. Sorokin, E.A. Sporov, A.E. Tenishev, and S.G. Tonapetyan, Nucl. Phys. B166, 525 (1980); A.S. Bratashevskij, A.A. Zybalov, S.P. Karasev, O.G. Konovalov, E.E. Korobova, A.S. Omelaenko, P.V. Sorokin, Yu.O. Storozhenko, and A.E. Tenishev, Yad. Fiz. 42, 658 (1985)
22. [16] E.D. Bloom, C.A. Heusch, C.Y. Prescott, and L.S. Rochester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 671 (1967); D.E. Lundquist, R.L. Anderson, J.V. Allaby, and D.M. Ritson, Phys. Rev. 168, 1527 (1968); A.S. Bratashevskij, V.G. Gorbenko, A.I. Derebchinskij, A.Ya. Derkach, Yu.V. Zhebrovskij, A.A. Zybalov, I.M. Karnaukhov, L.Ya. Kolesnikov, O.G. Konovalov, A.A. Lukhanin, A.S. Omelaenko, A.L. Rubashkin, P.V. Sorokin, E.A. Sporov, A.E. Tenishev, and S.G. Tonapetyan, Nucl. Phys. B166, 525 (1980); A.S. Bratashevskij, A.A. Zybalov, S.P. Karasev, O.G. Konovalov, E.E. Korobova, A.S. Omelaenko, P.V. Sorokin, Yu.O. Storozhenko, and A.E. Tenishev, Yad. Fiz. 42, 658 (1985)
23. [16] E.D. Bloom, C.A. Heusch, C.Y. Prescott, and L.S. Rochester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 671 (1967); D.E. Lundquist, R.L. Anderson, J.V. Allaby, and D.M. Ritson, Phys. Rev. 168, 1527 (1968); A.S. Bratashevskij, V.G. Gorbenko, A.I. Derebchinskij, A.Ya. Derkach, Yu.V. Zhebrovskij, A.A. Zybalov, I.M. Karnaukhov, L.Ya. Kolesnikov, O.G. Konovalov, A.A. Lukhanin, A.S. Omelaenko, A.L. Rubashkin, P.V. Sorokin, E.A. Sporov, A.E. Tenishev, and S.G. Tonapetyan, Nucl. Phys. B166, 525 (1980); A.S. Bratashevskij, A.A. Zybalov, S.P. Karasev, O.G. Konovalov, E.E. Korobova, A.S. Omelaenko, P.V. Sorokin, Yu.O. Storozhenko, and A.E. Tenishev, Yad. Fiz. 42, 658 (1985)