Selecting for storage: Local problems, local responses, and an emerging common challenge

Library Resources and Technical Services

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 176-183

  Hazen, Dan ^a  

^a HARVARD COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034287049     PISSN: 00242527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5860/lrts.44n4.176     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. [All Web site addresses valid as of Febuary 22, 2000]
2. Association of Research Libraries. 1990. Remote storage: Facilities, materials selection, and user services. Office of Management Services, Systems and Procedures Exchange Center, SPEC Kit 164.
3. Bellanti, Claire Q. 1992. Access to library materials in remote storage. In Access services in libraries: New solutions for collection management, ed. by Gregg Sapp, 93-103. New York: Haworth Pr.
4. Center for Research Libraries. 2000. Task Force of the Planning Committee [Foreign Official Gazettes]. http://wwwcrl. uchicago.edu/info/fogtf.htm
5. Chepesiuk, Ron. 1999. Reaching critical mass: Off site storage in the digital age. American Libraries 30, no. 4: 40-43.
6. Cooper, Michael D. 1989. A cost comparison of alternative book storage strategies. Library Quarterly 59: 239-60.
7. Harvard Library Digital Initiative. 2000. Library Digital Initiative: Digital Contents Pilot Project (DCPP). http://hul.harvard.edu/ ldi/html/dcpp.html
8. Kennedy, James R., and Gloria Stockton. 1991. The great divide: Challenges in remote storage. Chicago: ALA.
9. Latin American Network Information Center. 2000. Latin Americanist Research Resources Project. http://lanic.utexas. edu/project/arl/
10. Northern Regional Library Facility. 2000. Statement of operating principles, www.lib.berkeley.edu/NRLF/oppr2.html
11. O'Connor, Phyllis. 1994. Remote storage facilities: An annotated bibliography. Serials Review 20, no. 2: 17-26, 44.
12. Palladino, Grace. 1999. Out of sight, out of mind: shelving by height at the Library of Congress. The Chronicle of Higher Education June 11: B6.
13. Powell, Margaret K. 1998. Approaching clairvoyance: Notes toward selection for off site shelving. Against the Grain 10, no. 3: 23-24, 26, 28.
14. Silverstein, Craig, and Stuart M. Shieber. 1996. Predicting individual book use for off-site storage using decision trees. Library Quarterly 66: 266-93.
15. Yale University. 1996. Final report of the Working Group, Library Shelving Facility, October 1996. www.library.yale.edu/ Administration/Shelving/historical1.html
16. Young, Jeffrey R. 1997. In the new model of the research library, unused books are out, computers are in. The Chronicle of Higher Education, October 17: A27-28.
17. -. 1999. 3 top research libraries plan vast, new facility to store little-used books. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 30: A26.