A growth model for mixed forest stands

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 134, Issue 1-3, 2000, Pages 29-43

  Bartelink, H H ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Beech; Competition; Douglas fir; Radiation; Simulation; Thinning

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GROWTH MODELING; MIXED FOREST; PRODUCTIVITY;

EUROPE;

ABIES; FAGUS; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 0034284192     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00243-1     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Assmann, E., 1961. Waldertragskunde. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft, München, 490 pp.
2. Bartelink H.H. Allometric relationships on biomass and needle area of Douglas-fir. For. Ecol. Manage. 86:1996;193-203.
3. Bartelink H.H. Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Annales des Sciences Forestieres. 54:1997;39-50.
4. Bartelink H.H. Radiation interception by forest trees: a simulation approach. Ecol. Model. 105:1997;213-225.
5. Bartelink H.H. A model of dry matter partitioning in trees. Tree Physiol. 18:1998;91-101.
6. Bartelink H.H., Kramer K., Mohren G.M.J. Applicability of the radiation-use efficiency concept for simulating growth of monospecies and mixed forest stands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 88(1-4):1997;169-179.
7. Bartelink H.H., Tünnissen A.T.F.M. Groei en ontwikkeling van de menging douglas-beuk: meer dan de som der delen? Ned. Bosb. Tijdschr. 68(1):1996;2-6.
8. Botkin D.B., Janak J.F., Wallis J.R. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60(3):1972;849-872.
9. Burger H. Holz, Blattmenge und Zuwachs (X): die Buche. Mitt. schweiz. Anst. forstl. Versuchsw. 26(2):1950;419-468.
10. Burkhart, H.E., Tham, Å., 1992. Predictions from growth and yield models of the performance of mixed-species stands. In: Cannell, M.G.R., Malcolm, D.C., Robertson, P.A. (Eds.), The Ecology of Mixed-Species Stands of Trees. Proceedings of an IUFRO/BES-Symposium. Special Publication of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell, Oxford, 312 pp.
11. Cannell M.G.R. Physiological basis of wood production: a review. Scandinavian J. For. Res. 4:1989;459-490.
12. Cannell M.G.R., Dewar R.C. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modelling. Adv. Ecol. Res. 25:1994;59-104.
13. De Wit, C.T., 1960. On competition. Versl.Landbouwk.Onderz. No.66.8. Institute for Biological and Chemical Research on Field Crops and Herbage. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 82 pp.
14. Friend A.D., Shugart H.H., Running S.W. A physiology-based gap model of forest dynamics. Ecol. 74(3):1993;792-797.
15. Füldner, K., von Gadow, K., 1994. How to define a thinning in a mixed deciduous beech forest. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E., Preuhsler, T. (Eds.), Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements and Results, Models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, 25-29 April 1994, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal.
16. Gallagher J.N., Biscoe P.V. Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. J. Agric. Sci. 91:1978;47-60.
17. Harper, J., 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York, USA.
18. Hasenauer, H., 1994. A single tree simulator for uneven-aged mixed-species stands. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E., Preuhsler, T. (Eds.), Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements and Results, Models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, 25-29 April 1994, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal.
19. Hendriks C.M.A., Bianchi F.J.J.A. Root density and root biomass in pure and mixed forest stands of Douglas-fir and beech. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 43:1995;321-331.
20. Hillis, W.E., 1987. Heartwood and Tree Exudates. Springer Series in Wood Science. Springer, Berlin.
21. Hladik, M., Dursky, J., 1994. The structure and production of the mixed stands of beech and spruce. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E., Preuhsler, T. (Eds.), Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements and Results, Models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, 25-29 April 1994, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal.
22. Holmes M.J., Reed D.D. Competition indices for mixed-species northern hardwoods. For. Sci. 37(5):1991;1338-1349.
23. Jansen, J.J., Sevenster, J., Faber, P., 1996. Opbrengsttabellen voor belangrijke boomsoorten in Nederland. Hinkeloord Report No.17/IBN-rapport 221, Deparment of Forestry, Wageningen Agricultural University.
24. Jarvis, P.G., Leverenz, J.W., 1983. Productivity of temperate, deciduous and evergreen forests. In: Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B., Ziegler, H. (Eds.), Physiological Plant Ecology IV. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, vol.2D, Springer, New York, pp.233-280.
25. Judson O.P. The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;9-14.
26. Kahn M. Modellierung der Höhenentwicklung ausgewählter Baumarten in Abhängigkeit vom Standort. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München. 14:1994;221p.
27. Kelty, M.J., 1992. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty, M.J., Larson, B.C., Oliver, C.D. (Eds.), The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 287 pp.
28. Kelty, M.J., Cameron, I.R., 1994. Ecological principles of production differences between monocultures and mixtures. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E., Preuhsler, T. (Eds.), Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements and Results, Models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, 25-29 April 1994, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal.
29. Kennel, R., 1965. Untersuchungen über die Leistung von Fichte und Buche im Rein-und Mischbestand. Allgem. Forst- und Jagd-Z. 136, pp. 149-161 and 173-189.
30. Keyes M.R., Grier C.C. Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can. J. For. Res. 11:1981;599-605.
31. Kraalingen, D.W.G., Van, 1989. A Three-Dimensional Light Model for Crop Canopies. Internal report 17, Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen Agricultural University, 35 pp.
32. Kramer, 1996. Phenology and growth of European trees in relation to climate change. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, 210 pp.
33. Landsberg, J.J., 1986. Physiological Ecology of Forest Production. Academic Press, New York.
34. Larson, B.C., 1992. Pathways of development in mixed-species stands. In: Kelty, M.J., Larson, B.C., Oliver, C.D. (Eds.), The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 287 pp.
35. Lavigne, M.B., 1992. Exploring the possibilities of developing a physiological model of mixed stands. In: Kelty, M.J., Larson, B.C., Oliver, C.D. (Eds.), The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 287 pp.
36. Mäkelä A. Implications of the pipe-model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees. J. Theor. Biol. 123:1986;103-120.
37. Mohren, G.M.J., 1987. Simulation of forest growth, applied to Douglas-fir stands in the Netherlands. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, 184 pp.
38. Mohren G.M.J., Bartelink H.H. Modelling the effects of needle mortality rate and needle area distribution on dry matter production of Douglas-fir. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 38:1990;53-66.
39. Monteiro, M.L., Sales Luis, J., Jordao, M.F., Sariava, A.D., 1994. 11 years results in a Castanea sativa and Pseudotsuga menziesii mixed stand in northern Portugal. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E., Preuhsler, T. (Eds.), Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements and Results, Models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, 25-29 April 1994, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal.
40. Monteith, J.L., 1977. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, pp. 277-294.
41. Nikinmaa E. Analysis of the growth of scots pine; matching structure with function. Acta Forestalia Fennica. 235:1992;68p.
42. Niklas, K.J., 1992. Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function. The University of Chicago Press, London, pp. 410-415.
43. Nusslein S. Fichten-Reinbestand und Fichten-Buchen-Mischbestand im Leistungsvergleich. Allgemeine Forst Zeitschrift. 48(13):1993;682-684.
44. Olsthoorn A.F.M. Fine root density and root biomass of two Douglas-fir stands on sandy soils in The Netherlands: I. Root biomass in early summer. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 39:1991;49-60.
45. Olsthoorn, A.F.M., Bartelink, H.H., Gardiner, J., Pretzsch, H., Hekhuis, H.J., Franc, A., 1999. Management of Mixed-Species Forest: Silviculture and Economics. IBN Scientific Contributions 15, IBN-DLO, Wageningen, 389 pp.
46. Opdahl, H., 1994. Competition between spruce and birch in young stands. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E., Preuhsler, T. (Eds.), Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements and Results, Models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, 25-29 April 1994, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal.
47. Pretzsch, H., 1992. Konzeption und Konstruktion von Wuchsmodellen für Rein-und Mischbestände. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München Nr. 115, Schriftenreihe der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität München und der Bayerischen Forstlichen Versuchs-und Forschungsanstalt, 332 pp.
48. Pretzsch H. Analyze und Reproduktion räumlicher Bestandesstrukturen: Methodische Ueberlegungen am Beispiel Niedersächsischer Buchen-Lärchen-Mischbestände. Centralblatt für das gesamte Forstwesen. 112:1995;91-117.
49. Schoonderwoerd H., Daamen W.P. De bijgroei van bos in Nederland. Ned. Bosb. Tijdschr. 67:1995;16-22.
50. Shugart, H.H., 1984. A Theory of Forest Dynamics: The Ecological Implications of Forest Succession. Springer, New York, 278 pp.
51. Solomon, D.S., Leak, W.B., 1994. Modelling managed early successional mixed-species stands. In: Pinto da Costa, M.E., Preuhsler, T. (Eds.), Mixed Stands: Research Plots, Measurements and Results, Models. Proceedings from the Symposium of the IUFRO Working Groups S4.01, 25-29 April, 1994, Lousa-Coimbra, Portugal. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal.
52. Spitters C.J.T., Toussaint H.A.J.M., Goudriaan J. Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modelling canopy photosynthesis: I. components of incoming radiation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38:1986;217-229.
53. Stockle C.O., Kiniry J.R. Variability in crop radiation-efficiency associated with vapour-pressure deficit. Field Crops Research. 25:1990;171-181.
54. Tham, Å., 1988. Yield prediction after heavy thinning of birch in mixed stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.). Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Department of Forestry Yield Research, Report No. 23, 36 pp.
55. van der Zwan, R.P., van der Zee, M.E., 1991. Verbetering witheid Douglas-T.M.P. (in Dutch; Improvement brightness Douglas-T.M.P.). Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, Vakgroep Bosbouw (Report Wageningen Agricultural University, Department of Forestry), 45 pp.
56. West G.G. Douglas-fir, Japanese and European larch in pure and mixed stands. New Zealand J. For. Sci. 21(1):1991;3-9.
57. Wiedemann E. Der Vergleich der Massenleistung des Mischbestandes mit dem Reinbestand. Allgem. Forst-und Jagd-Z. 119:1943;123-132.
58. Wiedemann, E., 1950. Ertrachskundliche und waldbauliche Grundlagen der Forstwissenschaft. J.D. Sauerländer's Verlag, Frankfurt, 346 pp.
59. Zimmermann H. Zur Mischung von Buche und Fichte auf Mittelgebirgsstandorten in Hessen. Forst-und-Holz. 43(5):1988;103-106.