Competition-induced visual field differences in search

Psychological Science

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 386-393

  Fecteau, Jillian H ^a   Enns, James T ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE NET; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034281184     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00275     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Boles, D.B. (1983). Hemispheric interaction in visual field asymmetry. Cortex, 19, 99-113.
2. Boles, D.B. (1990). What bilateral displays do. Brain & Cognition, 12, 205-228.
3. Boles, D.B. (1994). An experimental comparison of stimulus type, display type, and input variable contributions to visual field asymmetry. Brain & Cognition, 24, 184-197.
4. Bryden, M.P., & Bulman-Fleming, M.B. (1994). Laterality effects in normal subjects: Evidence for interhemispheric interactions. Behavioural Brain Research, 64, 119-129.
5. Chaikin, J.D., Corbin, H.H., & Volkmann, J. (1962). Mapping a field of short-time visual search. Science, 138, 1327-1328.
6. Chedru, F., Leblanc, M., & Lhermitte, F. (1973). Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). Cortex, 9, 94-111.
7. Christman, S., & Niebauer, C. (1997). The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing (pp. 263-296). New York: Elsevier.
8. Christman, S.D. (1993). Local-global processing in the upper versus lower visual fields. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 275-278.
9. Cohen, G. (1972). Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 349-356.
10. Edwards, M., & Badcock, D.R. (1993). Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in depth: A centripetal bias. Perception, 22, 1013-1023.
11. Enns, J.T., & Kingstone, A. (1997). Hemispheric coordination of spatial attention. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing (pp. 197-231). New York: Elsevier.
12. Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (1992). VScope: General purpose tachistiscope for the Macintosh [Computer software]. Vancouver, Canada: Micropsych Software.
13. Felleman, D.J., & van Essen, D.C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1-47.
14. Findlay, J.M. (1980). The visual stimulus for saccadic eye movements in human observers. Perception, 9, 7-21.
15. Gattass, R., & Gross, C.G. (1981). Visual topography of striate projection zone (MT) in posterior superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 621-638.
16. Gazzaniga, M.S., & Smylie, C.S. (1983). Facial recognition and brain asymmetries: Clues to underlying mechanisms. Annals of Neurology, 13, 536-540.
17. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intiligator, J. (1997). Attentional resolution. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 115-121.
18. Heilman, K.M., Bowers, D., Valenstein, E., & Watson, R.T. (1986). The right hemisphere: Neuropsychological functions. Journal of Neurosurgery, 64, 693-704.
19. Horton, J.C., & Hoyt, W.F. (1991). Quadrantic visual-field defects: A hallmark of lesions in extrastriate (V2/V3) cortex. Brain, 114, 1703-1718.
20. Humphreys, G.W., & Riddoch, M.J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 283-311.
21. Ivry, R., & Robertson, L. (1998). Two sides of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Kingstone, A., Enns, J.T., Mangun, G.R., & Gazzaniga, M.S. (1995). Guided visual search is a left-hemisphere process in split-brain patients. Psychological Science, 6, 118-121.
23. LaBerge, D. (1995). Attentional processing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A., Mangun, G.R., & Gazzaniga, M.S. (1989). Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients. Nature, 342, 543-545.
25. Luck, S.J., Hillyard, S.A., Mangun, G.R., & Gazzaniga, M.S. (1994). Independent attentional scanning in the separated hemispheres of split-brain patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 84-91.
26. Maunsell, J.H.R., & Newsome, W.T. (1987). Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 10, 363-401.
27. Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 16, 220-224.
29. Payne, W.H. (1967). Visual reaction times on a circle about the fovea. Science, 15, 481-482.
30. Polich, J. (1980). Left hemisphere superiority for visual search. Cortex, 16, 39-50.
31. Polich, J. (1982). Hemispheric differences for visual search: Serial vs parallel processing revisited. Neuropsychologia, 20, 297-307.
32. Polich, J., De Francesco, D.P., Garon, J.F., & Cohen, W. (1990). Hemispheric differences in visual search of simple line arrays. Psychological Research, 52, 54-61.
33. Pollman, S. (1996). A pop-out induced extinction-like phenomenon in neurologically intact subjects. Neuropsychologia, 34, 413-425.
34. Posner, M.I., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neuroscience, 17, 75-79.
35. Previc, F.H. (1990), Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 519-575.
36. Previc, F.H. (1996). Attentional and oculomotor influences on visual field anisotropies in visual search performance. Visual Cognition, 3, 277-301.
37. Previc, F.H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 123-164.
38. Previc, F.H., & Blume, J.L. (1993). Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space. Vision Research, 33, 2697-2704.
39. Pylyshyn, Z., & Storm, R.W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
40. Ramachandran, V.S., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York: W. Morrow.
41. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W., Burroughs, E., & Luckhurst, L. (1995). Cueing in a case of neglect: Modality and automaticity effects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 605-621.
42. Rubin, N., Nakayama, K., & Shapley, R. (1996). Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields. Science, 271, 651-653.
43. Umilta, C., Salmaso, D., Bagnara, S., & Simion, F. (1979). Evidence for a right hemisphere superiority and for a serial search strategy in a dot detection task. Cortex, 15, 597-608.
44. White, M.J., & White, K.J. (1975). Parallel-serial processing and hemispheric function. Neuropsychologia, 13, 377-381.
45. Yund, E.W. (1997). Amplification of spatial nonuniformities by guided search mechanisms. In S. Christman (Ed.), Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing (pp. 161-195). New York: Elsevier.
46. Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Boston: Blackwell.