Caries inhibition efficacy of an antiplaque/antigingivitis dentifrice

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 4 SPEC. ISS., 2000, Pages

  Yu, Duncan ^a   Pearson, Sylvia K ^b   Bowen, William H ^b   Luo, Don ^a   Kohut, Bruce E ^a   Harper, D Scott ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTI INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; ANTICARIES AGENT; CINEOLE; CYCLOHEXANOL DERIVATIVE; DRUG VEHICLE; ESSENTIAL OIL; FLUORIDE; FLUOROPHOSPHATE; MENTHOL; PHOSPHATE; PLACEBO; SALICYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; SALICYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; SILICON DIOXIDE; TERPENE; THYMOL; TOOTHPASTE; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CARIOGENIC DIET; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DISEASE MODEL; EUCALYPTUS; GINGIVITIS; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; RAT; RAT STRAIN; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STREPTOCOCCUS SOBRINUS; TOOTH PLAQUE; VEHICLES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYCLOHEXANOLS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PLAQUE; DENTIFRICES; DIET, CARIOGENIC; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EUCALYPTUS; FLUORIDES; GINGIVITIS; MENTHOL; OILS, VOLATILE; PHOSPHATES; PLACEBOS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SALICYLATES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STREPTOCOCCUS SOBRINUS; TERPENES; THYMOL; VEHICLES;

EID: 0034280271     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. White DJ. The comparative sensitivity if intra-oral, in vitro, and animal models in the profile evaluation of topical fluorides. J Dent Res 1992; 71:884-894.
2. Stookey GK, Warrick JM, Miller LL, et al. Animal caries models for evaluating fluoride dentifrices. Adv Dent Res 1995; 9: 198-207.
3. FDA final monograph on OTC Anticaries Drug Products, 60 Fed. Reg. 52, 474 (Oct. 6, 1995) (Docket No. 80N-0042).
4. Stookey GK. Are all fluoride dentifrices the same? In: Wei SHY. Clinical uses of fluoride. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1985; 105-131.
5. Stookey GK, DePaola PF, Featherstone JDB, et al. A critical review of the relative anticaries efficacy of sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrices. Caries Res 1993; 27: 337-360.
6. Volpe AR, Petrone ME, Davies R. Clinical anticaries efficacy of NaF and SMFP dentifrices: Overview and resolution of the scientific controversy. J Clin Dent 1995; 6: 1-28.
7. Stamm JW. Clinical studies of neutral sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrices. International Congress and Symposium Series 209. The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd., London, 1994: 43-55.
8. Keyes PH. Dental Caries in the Molar Teeth of Rats. II. A method for diagnosing and scoring several types of lesions simultaneously. J Dent Res 1958; 37: 1088-1099.
9. Schuirmann, D. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1987; 15:657.