Assessment of inelastic response of buildings using force- and displacement-based approaches

Structural Design of Tall Buildings

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 251-277

  Borzi, B ^a   Elnashai, A S ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; DUCTILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC WAVES; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRUCTURAL LOADS;

DISPLACEMENT SPECTRA; INELASTIC ACCELERATION; SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEM;

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE;

EID: 0034274406     PISSN: 10628002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1794(200009)9:4<251::AID-TAL151>3.0.CO;2-V     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ. 1996. Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25:371-400.
2. American Concrete Institute Buildings Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete 1989. ACI 318-89, American Concrete Institute, Detroid, MI.
3. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS, Chlimintzas GO, Lee D. 1998. Review and development of response spectra for displacement-based seismic design. ESEE Research Report N 98-3, ICONS, Imperial College, London.
4. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS. 1999. Displacement spectra for seismic design, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1-32.
5. Borzi B, Calvi GM, Elnashai AS, Faccioli E, Bommer JJ. 1999. Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic design. ESEE Research Report No. 99-6, ICONS-NODISASTR, Imperial College. 1999.
6. Borzi B, Elnashai AS. In press. Refined force reduction factors for seismic design. Journal of Structural Engineering.
7. Calvi GM. 1996. Assessment of Existing Building. CEB Bulletin No. 236; Seismic Design of RC Structures for Controlled Inelastic Response. 159-204.
8. Calvi GM, Pinto PE. 1996. Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of bridges and recommendations for code provisions. ECOEST & PREC8, Report No. 4.
9. Eurocode 8, 1994. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structure 1989. ENV 1998-1, CEN, Brussels.
10. Gulkan P, Sozen M. 1974. Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions. ACI Journal 71:604-610.
11. Housner G, Jenning P. 1982. Earthquake design criteria. Monograph, EERI.
12. J.A. Martin & Associates. 1994. January 17, 1994, Northridge, California Earthquake. Instrumented Buildings Information System.
13. Negro P, Pinto AV, Verzelletti G, Magonette GE. 1996. PsD test on four-story R/C building designed according to Eurocodes. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 122:1409-1417.
14. Negro P, Verzeletti G, Magonette GE, Pinto AV. 1994. tests on a four-storey full-scale R/C frame designed according to Eurocodes 8 and 2: preliminary report. EUR 15879, Ispra (VA), Italy.
15. Paulay T, Priestley MJN. 1992. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. Wiley-Interscience.
16. Pinto AV. 1996. Pseudodynamic and shaking table tests on RC, bridges. ECOEST & PREC8, Report No. 5.
17. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM. 1991. Toward a capacity - design assessment procedure for reinforced concrete frame. Earthquake Spectra 7:413-437.
18. Saatcioglu M, Ozcebe G. 1989. Response of reinforced Concrete Columns to Simulated Seismic Loading. ACI Structural Journal 3-12.
19. Saatcioglu M, Ozcebe G, Lee BCK. 1988. Tests of reinforced concrete columns under uniaxial and biaxial load reversals. Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
20. UBC (Uniform Building Code), 1997. Structural Engineering Design Provisions, vol 2.