Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods for dynamic problems

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 110-118

  Sun, J S ^a   Lee, K H ^a   Lee, H P ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISKS (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INTEGRATION; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS); WAVEFRONTS;

EXPLICIT FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLICIT FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; SOFTWARE PACKAGE ABAQUS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034274347     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00580-X     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. ABAQUS User's Examples and Theory Manual, Version 5.7. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., 1998.
2. N. Rebelo, J.C. Nagtegaal, L.M. Taylor, Comparison of implicit and explicit finite element methods in the simulation of metal forming processes, in: Chenot, Wood, Zienkiewicz (Eds.), Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, 1992, pp. 99-108.
3. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., Application of implicit and explicit finite element techniques to metal forming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 45 (1994) 649-656.
4. H.M. Hilber, T.J.R. Hughes, Collocation, dissipation and 'overshoot' for time integration schemes in structural dynamics, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 6 (1978) 99-117.
5. T.J.R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method - Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 07632, 1987.
6. Z.H. Zhong, Finite Element Procedures for Contact - Impact Problems, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.